Godoy Sarah M, Chapman Mimi V, Jensen Todd M, Bath Eraka P, Abrams Laura S, Goode Rachel W, Hall William J
Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;13:1602085. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1602085. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether and to what extent family factors associated with risky sexual behaviors, such as experiencing commercial sexual exploitation (CSE) or having prior sexually transmitted infections (STIs), differ across risk groups of adolescents. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of a nationally representative dataset. Latent class analysis was used to assess heterogeneity in family characteristics and childhood adversity within classes of 1,018 adolescents who engaged in risky sexual behaviors, as evidenced by a self-reported STI and/or involvement in CSE. Participants were on average 15.49 years old (SD = 1.34), 50% female, and 58% people of color. RESULTS: A five-class solution was deemed optimal. These classes were labeled: (12%); (16%); (9%); (35%); and class (15%). Adolescents who were CSE-impacted represented 49% of the analytic sample and were observed across all five classes in differing yet not insignificant proportions (i.e., ranging from 37% to 60%). Findings illustrate significant variability in family patterns and differences marked by demographic and sexual risk characteristics. FINDINGS: The presence of CSE-impacted adolescents across latent classes speaks to the hidden nature of this crime and complexities related to CSE risk. Family relationships are often assumed to be protective against CSE. However, these findings point to considerable complexity in understanding how family functioning relates to CSE. Research that allows for longitudinal or retrospective analysis to understand how families were functioning at the time of CSE initiation, would help in delineating what types of families are most protective against CSE for adolescents.
背景:对于与危险性行为相关的家庭因素,如遭受商业性剥削(CSE)或既往有性传播感染(STIs),在不同风险组的青少年中是否存在差异以及差异程度如何,人们知之甚少。 方法:我们对一个具有全国代表性的数据集进行了二次分析。潜在类别分析用于评估1018名从事危险性行为青少年类别中的家庭特征和童年逆境的异质性,自我报告的性传播感染和/或参与商业性剥削可证明这一点。参与者平均年龄为15.49岁(标准差=1.34),50%为女性,58%为有色人种。 结果:五类解决方案被认为是最优的。这些类别被标记为:(12%);(16%);(9%);(35%);以及类别(15%)。受商业性剥削影响的青少年占分析样本的49%,在所有五个类别中均有观察到,比例各不相同但并非微不足道(即从37%到60%不等)。研究结果表明家庭模式存在显著差异,且存在由人口统计学和性风险特征所标记的差异。 研究结果:潜在类别中均存在受商业性剥削影响的青少年,这说明了这种犯罪的隐蔽性质以及与商业性剥削风险相关的复杂性。家庭关系通常被认为对商业性剥削有保护作用。然而,这些研究结果表明,在理解家庭功能与商业性剥削之间的关系方面存在相当大的复杂性。进行纵向或回顾性分析以了解商业性剥削开始时家庭功能状况的研究,将有助于确定哪些类型的家庭对青少年商业性剥削最具保护作用。
Front Public Health. 2025-8-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Autism Adulthood. 2024-12-2
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2025-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-3-16
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024-11-21
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023-7
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023-5
Psychol Rep. 2023-4