Suppr超能文献

急性护理环境中创伤后老年患者神经认知障碍检测筛查工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统综述

Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma in acute care settings: a systematic review.

作者信息

Merriman Niamh A, Walsh Mary E, Ferris Helena, Sexton Eithne, O'Regan Niamh, Penfold Rose S, Carrigan Marie, Coughlan Tara, Gurren Lorna, Adams Jodie, Reidy Chris, Jeyaseelan Arveen, Doyle Patrick, Ashraf Mubashra, Ó Flatharta Tomás, Hearne Siofra, Gaffey Jane, Brent Louise, Hickey Pamela, Blake Catherine

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Science, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01287-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia, are prevalent in older patients with physical trauma in acute care settings. Identifying NCDs in these patients can enhance care decisions to improve outcomes. This study aimed to identify the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for NCDs in older patients with trauma in acute care settings.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 01 March 2024. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥ 60 years); admitted to acute care setting following physical trauma; diagnostic accuracy study of a screening tool for (1) delirium and/or (2) cognitive impairment or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical diagnosis (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Methodological heterogeneity between the studies precluded meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies examining five different screening tools for delirium in older adults, all with hip fracture, were included. Studies reported wide variance in sensitivity (76.9-91.8) and specificity (54.5-99). Prevalence of detected delirium varied widely across studies (6.7-31.5%). All studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. No studies were found to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for cognitive impairment in older patients with trauma.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlights the dearth of studies validating screening tools for NCDs in older patients following trauma in acute care settings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024518730.

摘要

目的

神经认知障碍(NCDs),包括谵妄、认知障碍或痴呆,在急性护理环境中患有身体创伤的老年患者中很普遍。识别这些患者的神经认知障碍可以改善护理决策以提高治疗效果。本研究旨在确定急性护理环境中创伤老年患者神经认知障碍筛查工具的诊断准确性。

方法

检索电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Cochrane图书馆),检索时间从数据库建立至2024年3月1日。纳入标准为:老年人(≥60岁);因身体创伤入住急性护理机构;针对(1)谵妄和/或(2)认知障碍或痴呆的筛查工具相对于临床诊断参考标准(标准诊断标准或经过验证的工具)的诊断准确性研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估方法学质量。进行叙述性综合分析。研究之间的方法学异质性排除了进行荟萃分析的可能性。

结果

纳入了五项研究,这些研究考察了针对髋部骨折老年患者谵妄的五种不同筛查工具。研究报告的敏感性(76.9 - 91.8)和特异性(54.5 - 99)差异很大。各研究中检测到的谵妄患病率差异也很大(6.7 - 31.5%)。所有研究在至少一个领域存在高或不清楚的偏倚风险。未发现有研究考察创伤老年患者认知障碍筛查工具的诊断准确性。

结论

本系统评价突出了在急性护理环境中创伤老年患者中验证神经认知障碍筛查工具的研究匮乏。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024518730。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验