Li Lijuan, Wang Jing, Hu Tao, Xu Junmei, Huang Jiapeng
Department of Anesthesiology, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08154-3.
The study aims to compare the effects of multipoint thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia to general anesthesia alone in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS).
A total of 80 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the Thoracic Paravertebral Block group (TPVB group) and the General Anesthesia group (GA group). The TPVB group received multipoint TPVB combined with GA bilaterally at the T6 and T9 levels, while the GA group received only GA. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery scores (QoR-15) at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively, while secondary outcomes included NRS scores at different time points postoperatively, intraoperative sufentanil consumption, cumulative consumption of postoperative rescue analgesics, postoperative hospital length of stay, postoperative extubation time, time to first flatus and urination, and complications related to the nerve block.
The QoR-15 scores at 24 h and 48 h were significantly higher in TPVB group compared with GA group [24 h: 127.0(124.0,129.0) vs 113.0(109.0,115.0), 48 h: 139.0(137.0,141.0) vs 132.5(126.0,135.0) (P < 0.001)]. The NRS scores in the TPVB group were significantly lower than the GA group at different time points postoperatively (P < 0.05). The intraoperative sufentanil use was significantly less in the TPVB group and the TPVB group required less rescue analgesia (P < 0.05). The extubation time and first flatus time were significantly shorter in the TPVB group than in the GA group (P < 0.05).
Multipoint TPVB improves the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and reduces postoperative pain and opioid use.
本研究旨在比较多点胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉在代谢与减重手术(MBS)中的效果。
总共80例患者按1:1比例随机分为胸椎旁神经阻滞组(TPVB组)和全身麻醉组(GA组)。TPVB组在T6和T9水平双侧接受多点TPVB联合全身麻醉,而GA组仅接受全身麻醉。主要结局指标为术后24小时和48小时的恢复质量评分(QoR - 15),次要结局指标包括术后不同时间点的数字评分法(NRS)评分、术中舒芬太尼用量、术后补救镇痛药物的累计用量、术后住院时间、术后拔管时间、首次排气和排尿时间以及与神经阻滞相关的并发症。
与GA组相比,TPVB组术后24小时和48小时的QoR - 15评分显著更高[24小时:127.0(124.0,129.0) 对113.0(109.0,115.0),48小时:139.0(137.0,141.0) 对132.5(126.0,135.0) (P < 0.001)]。术后不同时间点TPVB组的NRS评分显著低于GA组(P < 0.05)。TPVB组术中舒芬太尼用量显著更少,且TPVB组所需的补救镇痛更少(P < 0.05)。TPVB组的拔管时间和首次排气时间显著短于GA组(P < 0.05)。
多点TPVB可改善代谢与减重手术(MBS)患者的术后恢复质量,并减轻术后疼痛和减少阿片类药物的使用。