Palmerini Emanuela, Meazza Cristina, Tamburini Angela, Márquez-Vega Catalina, Bisogno Gianni, Fagioli Franca, Ferraresi Virginia, Milano Giuseppe Maria, Coccoli Luca, Rubio-San-Simón Alba, Gallego Oscar, Llinares Riestra María Esther, Manzitti Carla, Mora Jaume, Vaz-Salgado Mᵃ Ángeles, Luksch Roberto, Mata Cristina, Pierini Michela, Carretta Elisa, Cesari Marilena, Paioli Anna, Marrari Andrea, Scotlandi Katia, Serra Massimo, Asaftei Sebastian Dorin, Gambarotti Marco, Picci Piero, Ferrari Stefano, Valverde Claudia, Ibrahim Toni, Broto Javier Martín
Osteoncology, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas, and Innovative Therapies Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Oct;43(28):3113-3122. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-00210. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
Outcome of patients with localized osteosarcoma is challenging. The role of mifamurtide is still a matter of debate. Two prospective trials were carried out in Italy (ISG/OS-2) and Spain (GEIS-33) with mifamurtide in ABCB1/P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-positive patients.
Patients age ≤40 years with localized extremity high-grade osteosarcoma were eligible. Analysis of Pgp expression from diagnostic biopsy was centralized. Patients received two cycles of preoperative methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatinum (MAP) before surgery. Postoperatively, in case of Pgp overexpression (Pgp-positive), mifamurtide was added, combined with doxorubicin (one cycle) and four consecutive cycles of high-dose ifosfamide (HDIFO) for patients with poor histologic response, or with MAP in case of good response. Patients who were Pgp-negative received MAP postoperatively. We present the merged analysis of ISG/OS-2 and GEIS-33 trial, an observational study with same inclusion criteria and treatment of ISG/OS-2. The primary endpoint was 5-year event-free survival (EFS) according to the use of mifamurtide. Secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
From March 2013 to April 2018, 398 patients were analyzed. The median age was 14 years (range, 4-40), male/female: 238/160 (1.48/1.0); 211 of 398 (53%) tumors were Pgp-positive, and 204 of 398 (51.3%) patients received mifamurtide. With a median follow-up of 70 months (IQR, 49-90 months), the 5-year EFS and OS were 65.2% (95% CI, 60.1 to 69.8) and 74.8% (95% CI, 69.8 to 79.0), respectively, with superior EFS for patients undergoing mifamurtide and chemotherapy as compared with EFS of patients undergoing chemotherapy alone (5-year EFS 71.4% 58.3%; = .0139) not confirmed at multivariable analysis ( = .0593).
In this merged analysis with a risk-adapted strategy for nonmetastatic osteosarcoma, the group with unfavorable prognoses, identified by Pgp expression, performed well when mifamurtide, combined with HDIFO in case of poor response, was administered after surgery.
局部骨肉瘤患者的治疗结果具有挑战性。米伐木肽的作用仍存在争议。意大利(ISG/OS - 2)和西班牙(GEIS - 33)针对ABCB1/P - 糖蛋白(Pgp)阳性患者开展了两项使用米伐木肽的前瞻性试验。
年龄≤40岁的局部肢体高级别骨肉瘤患者符合条件。诊断性活检的Pgp表达分析集中进行。患者在手术前接受两个周期的术前甲氨蝶呤、多柔比星和顺铂(MAP)治疗。术后,如果Pgp过表达(Pgp阳性),则添加米伐木肽,对于组织学反应较差的患者,联合多柔比星(一个周期)和四个连续周期的高剂量异环磷酰胺(HDIFO),如果反应良好则联合MAP。Pgp阴性的患者术后接受MAP治疗。我们展示了ISG/OS - 2和GEIS - 33试验的合并分析,这是一项具有与ISG/OS - 2相同纳入标准和治疗方法的观察性研究。主要终点是根据米伐木肽的使用情况得出的5年无事件生存期(EFS)。次要终点是总生存期(OS)。
2013年3月至2018年4月,对398例患者进行了分析。中位年龄为14岁(范围4 - 40岁),男性/女性:238/160(1.48/1.0);398例中的211例(53%)肿瘤为Pgp阳性,398例中的204例(51.3%)患者接受了米伐木肽治疗。中位随访70个月(四分位间距,49 - 90个月),5年EFS和OS分别为65.2%(95%置信区间,60.1至69.8)和74.8%(95%置信区间,69.8至79.0),与单纯接受化疗的患者相比,接受米伐木肽和化疗的患者EFS更高(5年EFS 71.4%对58.3%;P = 0.0139),但多变量分析未证实这一点(P = 0.0593)。
在这项针对非转移性骨肉瘤采用风险适应策略的合并分析中,通过Pgp表达确定的预后不良组,在术后给予米伐木肽并在反应较差时联合HDIFO治疗时,表现良好。