• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAP:用于在线测试和自动评分的创造力评估平台。

CAP: The creativity assessment platform for online testing and automated scoring.

作者信息

Patterson John D, Pronchick Jimmy, Panchanadikar Ruchi, Fuge Mark, van Hell Janet G, Miller Scarlett R, Johnson Dan R, Beaty Roger E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 18;57(9):264. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02761-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-025-02761-9
PMID:40826243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12361297/
Abstract

Creativity is increasingly recognized as a core competency for the 21st century, making its development a priority in education, research, and industry. To effectively cultivate creativity, researchers and educators need reliable and accessible assessment tools. Recent software developments have significantly enhanced the administration and scoring of creativity measures; however, existing software often requires expertise in experiment design and computer programming, limiting its accessibility to many educators and researchers. In the current work, we introduce CAP-the Creativity Assessment Platform-a free web application for building creativity assessments, collecting data, and automatically scoring responses (cap.ist.psu.edu). CAP allows users to create custom creativity assessments in ten languages using a simple, point-and-click interface, selecting from tasks such as the Short Story Task, Drawing Task, and Scientific Creative Thinking Test. Users can automatically score task responses using machine learning models trained to match human creativity ratings-with multilingual capabilities, including the new Cross-Lingual Alternate Uses Scoring (CLAUS), a large language model achieving strong prediction of human creativity ratings in ten languages. CAP also provides a centralized dashboard to monitor data collection, score assessments, and automatically generate text for a Methods section based on the study's tasks, metrics, and instructions-with a single click-promoting transparency and reproducibility in creativity assessment. Designed for ease of use, CAP aims to democratize creativity measurement for researchers, educators, and everyone in between.

摘要

创造力日益被视为21世纪的一项核心能力,这使得其培养成为教育、研究和行业的优先事项。为了有效地培养创造力,研究人员和教育工作者需要可靠且易于使用的评估工具。最近的软件开发显著改进了创造力测评的管理和评分;然而,现有的软件通常需要实验设计和计算机编程方面的专业知识,这限制了许多教育工作者和研究人员对其的使用。在当前的工作中,我们推出了CAP——创造力评估平台——一个用于构建创造力评估、收集数据并自动对回答进行评分的免费网络应用程序(cap.ist.psu.edu)。CAP允许用户使用简单的点击界面以十种语言创建自定义的创造力评估,从诸如短篇小说任务、绘画任务和科学创造性思维测试等任务中进行选择。用户可以使用经过训练以匹配人类创造力评分的机器学习模型自动对任务回答进行评分——具有多语言能力,包括新的跨语言替代用途评分(CLAUS),这是一个在十种语言中对人类创造力评分有强大预测能力的大语言模型。CAP还提供一个集中式仪表板,用于监控数据收集、对评估进行评分,并根据研究的任务、指标和说明一键自动生成方法部分的文本——促进创造力评估的透明度和可重复性。CAP旨在便于使用,目标是让研究人员、教育工作者以及介于两者之间的所有人都能平等地进行创造力测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/c6e58a7a7ab6/13428_2025_2761_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/cb0cecf73586/13428_2025_2761_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/4a7ad2fe0fed/13428_2025_2761_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/af617b18242c/13428_2025_2761_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/c1ed05e2e3fb/13428_2025_2761_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/c6e58a7a7ab6/13428_2025_2761_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/cb0cecf73586/13428_2025_2761_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/4a7ad2fe0fed/13428_2025_2761_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/af617b18242c/13428_2025_2761_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/c1ed05e2e3fb/13428_2025_2761_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8f/12361297/c6e58a7a7ab6/13428_2025_2761_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
CAP: The creativity assessment platform for online testing and automated scoring.CAP:用于在线测试和自动评分的创造力评估平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 18;57(9):264. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02761-9.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Scoring German Alternate Uses Items Applying Large Language Models.使用大语言模型对德语替代用法项目进行评分
J Intell. 2025 May 29;13(6):64. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060064.
4
Heron, a Knowledge Graph editor for intuitive implementation of Python-based experimental pipelines.Heron,一款用于直观实现基于Python的实验管道的知识图谱编辑器。
Elife. 2025 Jul 16;13:RP91915. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91915.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
Using a Diverse Test Suite to Assess Large Language Models on Fast Health Care Interoperability Resources Knowledge: Comparative Analysis.使用多样化测试套件在快速医疗保健互操作性资源知识方面评估大语言模型:比较分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 12;27:e73540. doi: 10.2196/73540.
7
The agreement of phonetic transcriptions between paediatric speech and language therapists transcribing a disordered speech sample.儿科言语和语言治疗师转写语音样本的音标转录的一致性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13043. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
8
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
Time-on-task and instructions help humans to keep up with AI: replication and extension of a comparison of creative performances.任务执行时间和指令有助于人类跟上人工智能的步伐:创造性表现比较的复制与拓展
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 20;15(1):20173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05745-z.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic assessment of divergent thinking in Chinese language with TransDis: A transformer-based language model approach.用 TransDis 对汉语发散思维进行自动评估:一种基于转换器的语言模型方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5798-5819. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02313-z. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
AuDrA: An automated drawing assessment platform for evaluating creativity.Audra:一个用于评估创造力的自动化绘图评估平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3619-3636. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02258-3. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task.
在创造性发散思维任务中,最优秀的人类仍然胜过人工智能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 14;13(1):13601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3.
4
Divergent semantic integration (DSI): Extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling.发散语义整合(DSI):通过分布语义建模从叙事中提取创造力。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3726-3759. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01986-2. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
lab.js: A free, open, online study builder.lab.js:一个免费的、开放的、在线的研究构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):556-573. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5.
6
Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance.使用 SemDis 自动化创造力评估:一个用于计算语义距离的开放式平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Apr;53(2):757-780. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01453-w.
7
Fostering students' creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program.通过为期一年的创造力培训计划培养学生的创造性思维技能。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0229773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229773. eCollection 2020.
8
The Dynamics of Creative Ideation: Introducing a New Assessment Paradigm.创造性构思的动态过程:引入一种新的评估范式。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02529. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessment of Divergent Thinking by means of the Subjective Top-Scoring Method: Effects of the Number of Top-Ideas and Time-on-Task on Reliability and Validity.运用主观高分法评估发散性思维:最佳想法数量和任务时长对信度与效度的影响
Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2013 Nov 1;7(4):341-349. doi: 10.1037/a0033644.
10
jsPsych: a JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser.jsPsych:一个在网页浏览器中创建行为实验的 JavaScript 库。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y.