Suppr超能文献

外周静脉导管的冲管:一项范围综述

Flushing peripheral intravenous catheters: A scoping review.

作者信息

Deng Jiaxin, Hernon Orlaith, Duggan Caitríona, Quinlan Leo R, Alfahl Zina, Carr Peter J

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Oncology, Portiuncula Hospital, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 19;20(8):e0330125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330125. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral intravascular catheters (PIVCs) are indispensable vascular access devices in healthcare, facilitating the administration of intravenous therapies. Despite their vital role, PIVCs are frequently associated with complications such as occlusion, infection, and thrombosis, which contribute to catheter failure. Flushing catheters is one of the most common practices during PIVC maintenance, as it cleans the internal catheter lumen, ensuring patency and reducing the risk of complications. However, inconsistencies in flushing practices such as flushing technique, volume to use, frequency, and methods highlight a lack of consensus in the literature and clinical guidelines.

METHODS

Following JBI scoping review methodology, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and grey literature sources. Studies were included if they focused on PIVC flushing techniques, flushing methods (speed, volume, frequencies, interval), or their impact on catheter-related outcomes. Data were charted using the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence, Research recommendations) framework.

RESULTS

Of the 4539 initial studies retrieved, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Key findings reveal significant variability in flushing practices, with no consensus on optimal technique (continuous, intermittent, or pulsatile), volume (commonly 5-10 mL), or frequency (ranging from every 6 hours to every 24 hours). Pulsatile flushing showed promise in laboratory studies for reducing bacterial colonization and maintaining catheter patency but lacked consistent clinical evidence. Fluid dynamics studies on the flushing process suggested potential endothelial injury from high flushing velocities and the need for standardized practices.

CONCLUSION

While some studies have investigated PIVC flushing, the existing research remains inconsistent, with a lack of clinical trials and mechanistic evidence on how flushing affects catheter patency, endothelial damage, and complication prevention.

摘要

背景

外周血管内导管(PIVC)是医疗保健中不可或缺的血管通路装置,有助于静脉治疗的实施。尽管它们起着至关重要的作用,但PIVC经常与诸如堵塞、感染和血栓形成等并发症相关,这些并发症会导致导管功能失效。冲洗导管是PIVC维护期间最常见的操作之一,因为它可以清洁导管内腔,确保通畅并降低并发症风险。然而,冲洗操作在冲洗技术、使用量、频率和方法等方面存在不一致性,这突出表明文献和临床指南中缺乏共识。

方法

按照JBI范围综述方法,在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL和灰色文献来源中进行了全面检索。如果研究聚焦于PIVC冲洗技术、冲洗方法(速度、量、频率、间隔)或其对导管相关结果的影响,则纳入研究。使用PAGER(模式、进展、差距、证据、研究建议)框架对数据进行图表绘制。

结果

在检索到的4539项初始研究中,39项符合纳入标准。主要发现显示冲洗操作存在显著差异,在最佳技术(连续、间歇或脉冲式)、量(通常为5 - 10 mL)或频率(从每6小时到每24小时不等)方面没有达成共识。脉冲式冲洗在实验室研究中显示出减少细菌定植和维持导管通畅的前景,但缺乏一致的临床证据。关于冲洗过程的流体动力学研究表明,高冲洗速度可能会对内皮造成损伤,因此需要标准化操作。

结论

虽然一些研究对外周血管内导管冲洗进行了调查,但现有研究仍然不一致,缺乏关于冲洗如何影响导管通畅、内皮损伤和并发症预防的临床试验和机制证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/664d/12364367/833bebf1f22c/pone.0330125.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验