Otieno Nickson Erick, Pryke James Stephen, Mukasi Jonathan
Zoology Department, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 19;20(8):e0329756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329756. eCollection 2025.
Crop-field structural management for boosting arthropod pest bio-control is increasingly recognized as an environmentally sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides. However, how natural pest regulation outcomes may be undermined by intraguild predation among pest natural enemies is seldom investigated in cereal crops-fields. Here we use δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analyses to assess intraguild predation amongst five arthropod taxa, comparing this to their consumption of three pest taxa, and test how such patterns relate to farming system (low-intensity/conventional) or cropping method (monoculture/intercropping) across 15 small non-transgenic maize fields. Overall, consumption of pests exceeded intraguild predation, especially Lepidoptera contribution to wasp, predatory beetle and predatory bug diets. However, every predatory taxon integrated diet carbon from all the others, particularly from predatory bugs. Predatory beetles showed the strongest connection to pest consumption while predatory bugs had the strongest connection to intraguild diet carbon. In general, wasps, predatory beetles and spiders exhibited more significant orientation towards pest consumption while predatory bugs were more of intraguild predators, but ants incorporated both food-sources nearly proportionately. Regarding influence of cropping options, pest consumption exceeded intraguild predation in intercropped compared to monoculture farms while for farming system, low-intensity rather than conventional systems promoted higher consumption of Lepidoptera pests. Low-intensity farming also enhanced intraguild consumption of predatory bugs. By contrast, while conventional farming boosted beetle and bug pest consumption, it was also associated with enhanced intraguild predation overall. Generally, therefore, field-level maize-field structural complexity through intercropping may be more impactful than chemical-free farming for mediating intraguild predation and hence boosting natural pest suppression. These findings, the first to quantitatively compare multiple-taxa pest consumption to intraguild predation in maize-fields, are important in informing appropriate agronomic management interventions within cereal-crop farming landscapes to maximize top-down pest biocontrol.
通过农田结构管理来增强节肢动物害虫的生物防治,日益被视为一种环境可持续的化学农药替代方法。然而,在谷类作物田中,害虫天敌之间的集团内捕食如何破坏自然害虫调控结果,却很少得到研究。在此,我们使用δ13C和δ15N稳定同位素分析来评估五个节肢动物类群之间的集团内捕食情况,并将其与它们对三种害虫类群的捕食进行比较,同时测试这些模式如何与15个小型非转基因玉米田的种植系统(低强度/传统)或种植方法(单作/间作)相关联。总体而言,对害虫的捕食超过了集团内捕食,尤其是鳞翅目昆虫在黄蜂、捕食性甲虫和捕食性蝽的食物中所占比例。然而,每个捕食类群的综合食物碳源都来自其他所有类群,特别是来自捕食性蝽。捕食性甲虫与害虫捕食的联系最为紧密,而捕食性蝽与集团内食物碳源的联系最为紧密。一般来说,黄蜂、捕食性甲虫和蜘蛛对害虫捕食的倾向性更为显著,而捕食性蝽更多地是集团内捕食者,但蚂蚁几乎同等比例地摄取了这两种食物来源。关于种植方式的影响,与单作农场相比,间作农场中对害虫的捕食超过了集团内捕食;而对于种植系统,低强度而非传统系统促进了对鳞翅目害虫的更高捕食量。低强度种植还增加了捕食性蝽的集团内捕食量。相比之下,虽然传统种植增加了甲虫和蝽类害虫的捕食量,但总体上也与集团内捕食的增加有关。因此,一般来说,通过间作增加田间层面玉米田的结构复杂性,对于调节集团内捕食从而增强自然害虫抑制作用可能比无化学农药种植更具影响力。这些发现首次在玉米田中对多个类群的害虫捕食与集团内捕食进行了定量比较,对于在谷类作物种植景观中制定适当的农艺管理干预措施以最大化自上而下害虫生物防治具有重要意义。