• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国医疗保健价值方面与收入相关的差异。

Income-related disparities in the value of health care in South Korea.

作者信息

Park Sungchul, Eggleston Karen, Do Young Kyung, Cutler David M

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, 616 Jane Stanford Way Stanford University Stanford, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 22;3(8):qxaf145. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf145. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf145
PMID:40831916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12359133/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health care spending in South Korea is associated with improvements in health. However, it remains unclear whether the value of this spending is equally distributed across income groups.

METHODS

We analyzed lifetime health care spending and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) by income quintile among South Korean adults from 2010 to 2018. We then calculated the ratio of changes in health care spending to changes in QALE to estimate the value of health care spending across income groups. Additionally, we investigated mechanisms underlying income-related differences in the value of health care.

RESULTS

Assuming 80% of QALE gains are attributable to health care, adults in the lowest-income quintile received the least value, incurring $78 209 per QALE gained. However, middle- and higher-income quintiles achieved greater value ($47 831, $46 905, $31 757, and $53 889 from the second to highest quintile), although the highest value did not occur in the highest-income quintile. The higher spending per QALE gained in the lowest-income quintile reflects smaller improvements in QALE, likely driven by poorer baseline health and greater unmet needs.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight structural inequities in the South Korean health system and emphasize the need for targeted policies to promote equitable health care value.

摘要

引言

韩国的医疗保健支出与健康状况改善相关。然而,这笔支出的价值是否在各收入群体中平均分配仍不明确。

方法

我们分析了2010年至2018年韩国成年人按收入五分位数划分的终身医疗保健支出和质量调整生命预期(QALE)。然后,我们计算了医疗保健支出变化与QALE变化的比率,以估计各收入群体的医疗保健支出价值。此外,我们还研究了医疗保健价值中与收入相关差异的潜在机制。

结果

假设QALE增加的80%归因于医疗保健,最低收入五分位数的成年人获得的价值最低,每增加一个QALE需花费78209美元。然而,中等收入和高收入五分位数群体获得了更高的价值(从第二高到最高五分位数分别为47831美元、46905美元、31757美元和53889美元),尽管最高价值并非出现在最高收入五分位数群体中。最低收入五分位数群体每增加一个QALE的支出较高,反映出QALE的改善较小,这可能是由于基线健康状况较差和未满足的需求较大所致。

结论

这些发现凸显了韩国医疗体系中的结构性不平等,并强调需要制定针对性政策以促进公平的医疗保健价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4639/12359133/e15a607b8a6e/qxaf145f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4639/12359133/5f9b909647fa/qxaf145f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4639/12359133/e15a607b8a6e/qxaf145f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4639/12359133/5f9b909647fa/qxaf145f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4639/12359133/e15a607b8a6e/qxaf145f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Income-related disparities in the value of health care in South Korea.韩国医疗保健价值方面与收入相关的差异。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 22;3(8):qxaf145. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf145. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy by Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Remoteness Area: Population Norms for Australia.按社会经济劣势和偏远地区划分的质量调整生命预期:澳大利亚的人口规范
Value Health. 2025 Jun;28(6):923-929. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.02.016. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
4
Longitudinal Income Dynamics and Risk of End-Stage Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A South Korean Population-Based Cohort Study.2型糖尿病患者的纵向收入动态与终末期肾病风险:一项基于韩国人群的队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Aug;86(2):166-177.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.02.609. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
5
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
6
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Effect of pre-end-stage kidney disease nephrology care on the association between neighborhood poverty and referral for kidney transplantation among patients with end-stage kidney disease.终末期肾病前期肾病护理对社区贫困与终末期肾病患者肾移植转诊之间关联的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 24;185:111878. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111878.
9
Inequalities in Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy in Australia by Educational Attainment.澳大利亚按教育程度划分的质量调整生命预期不平等情况。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01517-9.
10
Are There Sex Differences in the Association of Alcohol Consumption With the Risk of Soft Tissue Sarcoma? A Nationwide Population-based Study in Korea.饮酒与软组织肉瘤风险之间的关联存在性别差异吗?韩国一项基于全国人口的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003602.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Care Spending Increases and Value in South Korea.韩国的医疗保健支出增长与价值
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):e245145. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5145.
2
Use Of High- And Low-Value Health Care Among US Adults, By Income, 2010-19.美国成年人按收入划分的高值和低值医疗保健的使用情况,2010-19 年。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jul;43(7):1021-1031. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00661.
3
Trends in Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) and Disparities by Income and Region in Korea (2008-2020): Analysis of a Nationwide Claims Database.
韩国健康预期寿命(HALE)趋势及收入与地区差异(2008 - 2020年):基于全国索赔数据库的分析
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Feb 19;39(6):e46. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e46.
4
Socioeconomic differences in the perception of inequalities in healthcare utilization and health in South Korea.韩国在医疗服务利用和健康方面不平等认知上的社会经济差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Oct 2;36:102445. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102445. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Population health outcomes in South Korea 1990-2019, and projections up to 2040: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990-2019 年韩国人口健康结果及 2040 年预测:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Aug;8(8):e639-e650. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00122-6.
6
Has South Korea achieved the goals of national health insurance? Trends in financial protection of households between 2011 and 2018.韩国是否实现了全民健康保险的目标?2011 年至 2018 年期间家庭财务保障的趋势。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jun;326:115929. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115929. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Health disparity and healthcare utilization inequity among older adults living in poverty in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.韩国贫困老年人群体中的健康差异和医疗保健利用不公平:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Dec 27;22(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03686-0.
8
The impact of benefits coverage expansion of social health insurance: Evidence from Korea.社会医疗保险福利覆盖范围扩大的影响:来自韩国的证据。
Health Policy. 2022 Sep;126(9):925-932. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
9
"REACHing" for Equity - Moving from Regressive toward Progressive Value-Based Payment.追求公平——从基于回归的支付向基于进步价值的支付转变
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 14;387(2):97-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2204749. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
10
Health Care Spending Effectiveness: Estimates Suggest That Spending Improved US Health From 1996 To 2016.卫生保健支出的有效性:研究估计 1996 年至 2016 年期间美国卫生状况的改善得益于支出的增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jul;41(7):994-1004. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01515.