Byrne Samuel, Lau Clayton, Gopalan Maya, Mata-Diaz Sandra, Raugi Gregory J
University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle.
University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix.
Fed Pract. 2025 May;42(Suppl 2):S10-S14. doi: 10.12788/fp.0587. Epub 2025 May 8.
Store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) involves sending clinical images and patient information to a dermatologist for evaluation and is widely used in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Integrated Service Network 20. While SFT has increased access to dermatologic care, its impact on timely treatment is less well known. This study compares the timeline of care for melanoma treatment between SFT and face-to-face (FTF) dermatologic care and identifies potential areas for SFT improvement.
This study at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System included 107 patients in the FTF group and 87 patients in the SFT group. Electronic health record data were reviewed and key dates were extracted for patients in each group, including entry into episode of care (EEC), biopsy, and definitive excision. Median and mean intervals were compared between groups. To further analyze the groups, the FTF group was subdivided into where melanomas were entered into care, either at a dermatology clinic (FTF dermatology) or a primary care/nondermatology setting (FTF primary care).
The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision for patients in the FTF and SFT groups were 58 and 73 days ( = .004), respectively. The median intervals from EEC to definitive excision in the FTF dermatology and FTF primary care groups were 37 and 78 days, respectively. Handoffs in SFT accounted for 6 to 12 days of the total timeline of care.
The fastest timeline of care for primary cutaneous melanoma is obtained when FTF dermatology is the EEC. The SFT timeline is significantly longer than that of FTF. Facilitating handoffs in SFT presents an opportunity for process improvement. The SFT timeline could be improved if the EEC, imaging, and SFT consultation requests all occurred on the same day.
存储转发式远程皮肤病学(SFT)涉及将临床图像和患者信息发送给皮肤科医生进行评估,在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)第20退伍军人综合服务网络中被广泛使用。虽然SFT增加了获得皮肤科护理的机会,但其对及时治疗的影响尚鲜为人知。本研究比较了SFT和面对面(FTF)皮肤科护理之间黑色素瘤治疗的护理时间线,并确定了SFT改进的潜在领域。
在VA普吉特海湾医疗保健系统进行的这项研究中,FTF组有107名患者,SFT组有87名患者。回顾了电子健康记录数据,并提取了每组患者的关键日期,包括进入护理阶段(EEC)、活检和确定性切除。比较了两组之间的中位数和平均间隔。为了进一步分析这些组,FTF组被细分为黑色素瘤在皮肤科诊所(FTF皮肤科)或初级保健/非皮肤科环境(FTF初级保健)接受护理的情况。
FTF组和SFT组患者从EEC到确定性切除的中位间隔分别为58天和73天(P = .004)。FTF皮肤科组和FTF初级保健组从EEC到确定性切除的中位间隔分别为37天和78天。SFT中的交接占护理总时间线的6至12天。
当FTF皮肤科是EEC时,原发性皮肤黑色素瘤的护理时间线最快。SFT的时间线明显长于FTF。促进SFT中的交接为流程改进提供了机会。如果EEC、成像和SFT咨询请求都在同一天进行,SFT的时间线可能会得到改善。