Rodriguez-Lopez Victor, Dotor-Goytia Paulina, Moreno Elena, Vinas-Pena Maria
Institute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (IO-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 4;12:1504560. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1504560. eCollection 2025.
The study of polychromatic visual perception is challenging due to the number of entangled factors involved in the process, from the cues within visual information from the outside world, to the ocular optics, the retinal properties, and neural adaptation processes in the brain.
In this study, we used an adaptive optics (AO)- based polychromatic visual simulator to investigate the perception of combined optical cues and its dependence on refractive error. Subjective best focus was obtained as the average of 3 repeated measurements for (1) polychromatic and five monochromatic wavelengths in the visible (450-670 nm); (2) three different visual stimuli (conventional binary sunburst, natural outdoor image, natural indoor image); and (3) under natural aberrations (no-AO) and corrected aberrations (AO) conditions. Repeatability was determined as the standard deviation across repetitions. Chromatic difference of focus (CDF) was calculated for Green-Blue (G-Blue, 550-470 nm) and Green-Red (G-Red, 550-700 nm). Longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) was estimated using a polynomial regression fit of the best subjective focus curves as a function of the wavelength. Nine young adults (28 ± 6 years) with different refractive profiles (6 myopic and 3 emmetropic) participated in this study.
CDF showed different trends in the G-Red and the G-Blue regions, especially for the binary stimulus and after AO-correction of aberrations. However, in the myopic group, CDF was similar in absolute value for G-Blue and G-Red (0.61 ± 0.34 and 0.73 ± 0.58, respectively, > 0.05 Mann-Whitney U test), whereas, in the emmetropic group, the chromatic difference was greater for G-Blue than for G-Red (0.58 ± 0.32 D and 0.22 ± 0.38 D, respectively, < 0.05 Mann-Whitney U test). There was no effect of correcting natural aberrations. LCA does not vary with refractive error.
Overall, the results of this study suggest that the refractive profile may influence how visual information with specific chromatic properties is perceived and processed, potentially shaping visual mechanisms involved in chromatic defocus perception.
多色视觉感知的研究具有挑战性,因为该过程涉及众多相互纠缠的因素,从外部世界视觉信息中的线索,到眼光学、视网膜特性以及大脑中的神经适应过程。
在本研究中,我们使用基于自适应光学(AO)的多色视觉模拟器来研究组合光学线索的感知及其对屈光不正的依赖性。通过对(1)可见光谱(450 - 670纳米)中的多色光和五个单色光波长;(2)三种不同的视觉刺激(传统二元太阳burst、自然室外图像、自然室内图像);以及(3)在自然像差(无AO)和校正像差(AO)条件下进行3次重复测量的平均值来获得主观最佳焦点。重复性通过重复测量的标准差来确定。计算绿 - 蓝(G - 蓝,550 - 470纳米)和绿 - 红(G - 红,550 - 700纳米)的焦点色差(CDF)。使用最佳主观焦点曲线作为波长函数的多项式回归拟合来估计纵向色差(LCA)。九名具有不同屈光状态(6名近视和3名正视)的年轻成年人(28 ± 6岁)参与了本研究。
CDF在G - 红和G - 蓝区域呈现不同趋势,特别是对于二元刺激以及像差经AO校正后。然而,在近视组中,G - 蓝和G - 红的CDF绝对值相似(分别为0.61 ± 0.34和0.73 ± 0.58,曼 - 惠特尼U检验>0.05),而在正视组中,G - 蓝的色差大于G - 红(分别为0.58 ± 0.32 D和0.22 ± 0.38 D,曼 - 惠特尼U检验<0.05)。校正自然像差没有影响。LCA不随屈光不正而变化。
总体而言,本研究结果表明屈光状态可能会影响具有特定颜色特性的视觉信息的感知和处理方式,可能会塑造与色差散焦感知相关的视觉机制。