Ee See Ong Dennis, Mohd Khialdin Safinaz
Department of Ophthalmology, UKM (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia) Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 11;17(7):e87714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87714. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Emmetropization was thought to result from a genetically determined process until later discoveries found that myopia could be induced, which implied that environmental factors, even modest changes, can affect eye growth under local retinal control. Humans are born with refractive errors and emmetropize into a refractive state of no error during the developmental period. For many years, it has not yet been clearly known how the eye determines the sign of defocus during the developmental period. This review aimed to study the effects of blue light on emmetropization, especially in this digital era where children are being exposed to electronic devices that emit blue light at a very young age. In view of the possible detrimental effects of blue light on the retina, the effects of blue light need to be understood and clearly studied to achieve a balance for the healthy development of the human eyes. The mechanisms of emmetropization and development of refractive errors were studied, and articles involving a wide range of animal models, such as chicks, guinea pigs, monkeys, and tree shrews, were reviewed in this review. Numerous studies collectively revealed that emmetropization is a complicated process involving the interaction of multiple factors, such as longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA), temporal frequency, bandwidth of light wavelength, light intensity, temporal contrast, circadian rhythm disruption, and hormones. This review focused mainly on chromatic aberration. LCA causes wavelength defocus, leading to refractive changes. It has been observed that chicks, Cichlid fish, and guinea pigs became more hyperopic when exposed to short-wavelength blue light compared to those exposed to red light. The results seemed to be conflicting in tree shrews and rhesus monkeys, but the reasons are still unclear. Experiments have also shown that LCA is not essential for emmetropization, as the eyes of many species could compensate for lens-induced myopia or form deprivation in monochromatic illumination. The measurement of ocular biometry can be influenced by the lighting conditions. For instance, under red or white light, the axial length of the eye tends to increase without any refractive changes. Conversely, when exposed to blue and white light, the eye length decreases in the presence of positive lens defocus, but this effect is not observed under red light. Furthermore, the choroidal thickness increases when a positive lens is used in red and white light, but no changes occur under blue light. It is important to note that variations in the response of ocular biometry to lighting conditions have been observed among different species. Despite these alterations, the impact of lighting conditions on emmetropization, or the process of achieving normal vision, is temporary and short-term.
在后来的发现表明近视可以被诱导之前,人们认为正视化是由基因决定的过程,这意味着环境因素,即使是适度的变化,在局部视网膜控制下也会影响眼睛的生长。人类出生时存在屈光不正,并在发育期间发展为无屈光不正的状态。多年来,人们一直不清楚眼睛在发育期间是如何确定散焦信号的。这篇综述旨在研究蓝光对正视化的影响,尤其是在这个数字时代,儿童在很小的时候就接触到发出蓝光的电子设备。鉴于蓝光可能对视网膜产生有害影响,需要了解并清楚地研究蓝光的影响,以实现人眼健康发育的平衡。本文研究了正视化和屈光不正发展的机制,并综述了涉及多种动物模型(如小鸡、豚鼠、猴子和树鼩)的文章。众多研究共同表明,正视化是一个复杂的过程,涉及多种因素的相互作用,如纵向色差(LCA)、时间频率、光波长带宽、光强度、时间对比度、昼夜节律紊乱和激素。本综述主要关注色差。纵向色差会导致波长散焦,从而引起屈光变化。据观察,与暴露于红光的小鸡、丽鱼科鱼和豚鼠相比,暴露于短波长蓝光的它们会变得更加远视。在树鼩和恒河猴中,结果似乎相互矛盾,但原因仍不清楚。实验还表明,纵向色差对于正视化并非必不可少,因为许多物种的眼睛可以在单色照明下补偿晶状体诱导的近视或形觉剥夺。眼生物测量的结果可能会受到光照条件的影响。例如,在红光或白光下,眼睛的眼轴长度往往会增加,而没有任何屈光变化。相反,当暴露于蓝光和白光下时,在存在正透镜散焦的情况下眼轴长度会缩短,但在红光下未观察到这种效应。此外,当在红光和白光下使用正透镜时脉络膜厚度会增加,但在蓝光下没有变化。需要注意的是,不同物种之间观察到了眼生物测量对光照条件反应的差异。尽管有这些变化,但光照条件对正视化或实现正常视力过程的影响是暂时的和短期的。