Vedenpää Mimmi M S, Sagelv Edvard H, Torstveit Monica Klungland, Borch Kristin Benjaminsen, Osborne John Owen
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
School of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Sep;25(9):e70043. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.70043.
The purpose of this study was to report and compare the prevalence of disordered eating behaviours (DEBs) among Norwegian female athletes of different competition levels and sport types, and non-athletes of different physical activity levels. A total of 565 females (athletes: n = 189; non-athletes: n = 376) completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q). Athletes were categorised as recreational (n = 72), national (n = 94), or elite (n = 23), while non-athlete females were sedentary (n = 111) or physically active but non-competitive (exercisers: n = 265). A global EDE-Q score of > 2.5 was considered as increased risk of an eating disorder. Data were modelled using linear or logistic regression, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), age category, and education level. Global EDE-Q score was lower among recreational (mean [95% confidence interval]): (1.73 [1.31, 2.14]; p = 0.003; d = 0.50) and national-level athletes (1.89 [1.52,2.26]; p = 0.024; d = 0.39) compared to exercisers (2.47 [2.19,2.75]), with recreational athletes also scoring lower than sedentary females (2.43 [2.09,2.78]; p = 0.022; d = 0.47). Leanness focused sports had higher restraint (p = 0.046; d = 0.30) and eating concern (p = 0.025; d = 0.35) subscale scores compared to non-leanness focused sports. Recreational- or national-level athletes scored on average lower DEB symptoms using EDE-Q, compared to sedentary and physical-active non-athletes. No EDE-Q difference was found between competition levels. Leanness focused sport athletes were more concerned about eating behaviours and had higher restraint than athletes from non-leanness focused sports. These findings suggest that sport participation may be associated with lower or higher disordered eating symptoms, depending on competitive level and type of sport, highlighting the complexity of these relationships in physically active females.
本研究的目的是报告并比较不同竞赛水平和运动类型的挪威女运动员以及不同身体活动水平的非运动员中饮食失调行为(DEB)的患病率。共有565名女性(运动员:n = 189;非运动员:n = 376)完成了饮食失调检查问卷6.0(EDE-Q)。运动员被分为业余(n = 72)、国家级(n = 94)或精英级(n = 23),而非运动员女性则分为久坐不动(n = 111)或有身体活动但不参加竞赛(锻炼者:n = 265)。EDE-Q的全球得分> 2.5被认为饮食失调风险增加。数据采用线性或逻辑回归模型,并根据体重指数(BMI)、年龄类别和教育水平进行调整。与锻炼者(2.47 [2.19, 2.75])相比,业余(平均[95%置信区间]):(1.73 [1.31, 2.14];p = 0.003;d = 0.50)和国家级运动员(1.89 [1.52, 2.26];p = 0.024;d = 0.39)的EDE-Q全球得分较低,业余运动员的得分也低于久坐不动的女性(2.43 [2.09, 2.78];p = 0.022;d = 0.47)。与非注重瘦身的运动相比,注重瘦身的运动有更高的克制(p = 0.046;d = 0.30)和饮食关注(p = 0.025;d = 0.35)子量表得分。与久坐不动和有身体活动的非运动员相比,业余或国家级运动员使用EDE-Q的DEB症状平均得分较低。竞赛水平之间未发现EDE-Q差异。与非注重瘦身运动的运动员相比,注重瘦身运动的运动员更关注饮食行为且有更高的克制。这些发现表明,根据竞赛水平和运动类型,参与运动可能与较低或较高的饮食失调症状相关,凸显了这些关系在有身体活动的女性中的复杂性。