Gan Xiaohan, Meng Linghao, Cao Shangqi, Bai Hexiang, Li Xiang
West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0330062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330062. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to longitudinally investigate the impact of baseline frailty status and its changes over time on the risk of incident urinary incontinence (UI) in older adults, using data from two large prospective cohorts.
This study included community-dwelling older participants from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Frailty status was assessed using a Frailty Index (FI) categorized as robust, pre-frail, and frail. Changes in frailty status were evaluated at baseline and at a second survey two years later. The primary outcome was incident UI, determined by participant self-report. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), adjusting for multiple covariates.
In the baseline frailty status analysis, a total of 12,398 participants from CHARLS and 13,817 from HRS were included. Compared to robust participants, frail participants had a significantly increased risk of incident UI (CHARLS: HR 4.51, 95% CI 3.77-5.38; HRS: HR 2.25, 95% CI 2.07-2.46), and pre-frail participants also had a significantly increased risk (CHARLS: HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.79-2.55; HRS: HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38-1.62). In the analysis of changes in frailty status, participants who progressed from robust to pre-frail/frail had a significantly increased risk of incident UI compared to those who remained robust (CHARLS: HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.94-4.08; HRS: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.24-1.68). Conversely, participants who recovered from frail to robust/pre-frail had a significantly decreased risk of incident UI compared to those who remained frail(CHARLS: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.62; HRS: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90). Subgroup analyses revealed similar results.
Frailty and worsening frailty status are significantly associated with an increased risk of Urinary Incontinence in older adults, while recovery of frailty status is associated with a decreased risk.
本研究旨在利用两个大型前瞻性队列的数据,纵向调查基线虚弱状态及其随时间的变化对老年人发生尿失禁(UI)风险的影响。
本研究纳入了来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)和健康与退休研究(HRS)的社区居住老年人。使用虚弱指数(FI)评估虚弱状态,分为强壮、脆弱前期和虚弱。在基线和两年后的第二次调查中评估虚弱状态的变化。主要结局是发生尿失禁,由参与者自我报告确定。使用Cox比例风险回归模型计算风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs),并对多个协变量进行调整。
在基线虚弱状态分析中,CHARLS共有12398名参与者,HRS有13817名参与者。与强壮的参与者相比,虚弱的参与者发生尿失禁的风险显著增加(CHARLS:HR 4.51,95%CI 3.77-5.38;HRS:HR 2.25,95%CI 2.07-2.46),脆弱前期的参与者风险也显著增加(CHARLS:HR 2.14,95%CI 1.79-2.55;HRS:HR 1.50,95%CI 1.38-1.62)。在虚弱状态变化分析中,从强壮进展为脆弱前期/虚弱的参与者与保持强壮的参与者相比,发生尿失禁的风险显著增加(CHARLS:HR 2.81,95%CI 1.94-4.08;HRS:HR 1.44,95%CI 1.24-1.68)。相反,从虚弱恢复为强壮/脆弱前期的参与者与仍处于虚弱状态的参与者相比,发生尿失禁的风险显著降低(CHARLS:HR 0.51,95%CI 0.41-0.62;HRS:HR 0.79,95%CI 0.69-0.90)。亚组分析显示了类似的结果。
虚弱和虚弱状态恶化与老年人尿失禁风险增加显著相关,而虚弱状态的恢复与风险降低相关。