• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的中风后脑心综合征预测模型:一项风险分层研究。

Machine learning-based prediction model for post-stroke cerebral-cardiac syndrome: a risk stratification study.

作者信息

Zhang Tingyu, Hao Zelin, Jiang Qunlian, Zhu Linhui, Ye Lifang

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Heart Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), No. 158 Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10104-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-10104-z
PMID:40835616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12368185/
Abstract

Cerebral-cardiac syndrome (CCS) is a severe cardiac complication following acute ischemic stroke, often associated with adverse outcomes. This study developed and validated a machine learning (ML) model to predict CCS using clinical, laboratory, and pre-extracted imaging features. A retrospective cohort of 511 post-stroke patients was analyzed. Data on demographics, laboratory results, imaging findings, and medications were collected. CCS diagnosis was based on cardiac dysfunction occurring after stroke, excluding pre-existing cardiac diseases. Five machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and Deep Neural Network, were trained on 80% of the data and tested on the remaining 20%. Discrimination was assessed by AUC (95% CI), calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow test and Brier score, and thresholds by Youden's index. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHAP. On the test set, XGBoost achieved the highest discrimination (AUC 0.879; 95% CI 0.807-0.942), accuracy 0.825, precision 0.844, recall 0.675, and F1 score 0.750. Random forest followed closely (AUC 0.866; accuracy 0.845; precision 0.962; recall 0.625; F1 0.758). SVM and logistic regression yielded AUCs of 0.853 and 0.818, respectively. Calibration was optimal for SVM (HL p > 0.05; Brier 0.126) and random forest (HL p > 0.05; Brier 0.131). SHAP analysis identified D-dimer, ACEI/ARB use, HbA1c, C-reactive protein, and prothrombin time as top predictors. ML-based models accurately predict early CCS in ischemic stroke patients. XGBoost offers superior discrimination, while SVM and random forest demonstrate better calibration. Incorporation of these models into clinical workflows may enhance risk stratification and guide targeted preventive strategies.

摘要

脑心综合征(CCS)是急性缺血性卒中后的一种严重心脏并发症,常与不良预后相关。本研究开发并验证了一种机器学习(ML)模型,用于利用临床、实验室和预先提取的影像特征预测CCS。对511例卒中后患者的回顾性队列进行了分析。收集了人口统计学、实验室检查结果、影像检查结果和用药情况的数据。CCS诊断基于卒中后出现的心脏功能障碍,排除既往存在的心脏病。包括逻辑回归、随机森林、支持向量机(SVM)、XGBoost和深度神经网络在内的五种机器学习模型在80%的数据上进行训练,并在其余20%的数据上进行测试。通过AUC(95%CI)评估辨别力,通过Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和Brier评分评估校准情况,通过约登指数评估阈值。使用SHAP评估模型的可解释性。在测试集上,XGBoost实现了最高的辨别力(AUC 0.879;95%CI 0.807-0.942),准确率0.825,精确率0.844,召回率0.675,F1分数0.750。随机森林紧随其后(AUC 0.866;准确率0.845;精确率0.962;召回率0.625;F1 0.758)。SVM和逻辑回归的AUC分别为0.853和0.818。SVM(HL p>0.05;Brier 0.126)和随机森林(HL p>0.05;Brier 0.131)的校准情况最佳。SHAP分析确定D-二聚体、使用ACEI/ARB、糖化血红蛋白、C反应蛋白和凝血酶原时间为主要预测因素。基于ML的模型可准确预测缺血性卒中患者的早期CCS。XGBoost具有卓越的辨别力,而SVM和随机森林表现出更好的校准。将这些模型纳入临床工作流程可能会加强风险分层并指导有针对性的预防策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/01c9caf70998/41598_2025_10104_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/5312ad6c5fdc/41598_2025_10104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/3a92a75636fb/41598_2025_10104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/b5960068244a/41598_2025_10104_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/4627e91ce86c/41598_2025_10104_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/01c9caf70998/41598_2025_10104_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/5312ad6c5fdc/41598_2025_10104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/3a92a75636fb/41598_2025_10104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/b5960068244a/41598_2025_10104_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/4627e91ce86c/41598_2025_10104_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea9/12368185/01c9caf70998/41598_2025_10104_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning-based prediction model for post-stroke cerebral-cardiac syndrome: a risk stratification study.基于机器学习的中风后脑心综合征预测模型:一项风险分层研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10104-z.
2
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
3
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Construction and validation of HBV-ACLF bacterial infection diagnosis model based on machine learning.基于机器学习的HBV-ACLF细菌感染诊断模型的构建与验证
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11199-5.
6
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for stroke-associated pneumonia in older adult hemorrhagic stroke.老年出血性卒中患者卒中相关性肺炎的基于机器学习的风险预测模型的开发与验证
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1591570. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1591570. eCollection 2025.
7
Optimized feature selection and advanced machine learning for stroke risk prediction in revascularized coronary artery disease patients.优化特征选择与先进机器学习用于预测冠状动脉疾病血运重建患者的卒中风险
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03116-2.
8
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Development and Validation Using Insights From a Japanese Population-Based Study.预测冠心病风险的机器学习模型:基于日本人群研究的见解进行开发与验证
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e68066. doi: 10.2196/68066.
9
[Construction and external validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for epilepsy one year after acute stroke].[基于机器学习的急性卒中后一年癫痫预测模型的构建与外部验证]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 May;37(5):445-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20241225-01069.
10
Machine-learning models to predict serious adverse hospitalization events after ACS.用于预测急性冠状动脉综合征后严重不良住院事件的机器学习模型。
Postgrad Med J. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgae180.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Development and Validation Using Insights From a Japanese Population-Based Study.预测冠心病风险的机器学习模型:基于日本人群研究的见解进行开发与验证
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e68066. doi: 10.2196/68066.
2
Prediction of depressive disorder using machine learning approaches: findings from the NHANES.使用机器学习方法预测抑郁症:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02903-1.
3
Machine learning and deep learning algorithms in stroke medicine: a systematic review of hemorrhagic transformation prediction models.
中风医学中的机器学习与深度学习算法:出血性转化预测模型的系统综述
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12810-6.
4
A machine learning-based risk score for prediction of mechanical ventilation in children with dengue shock syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习的登革热休克综合征患儿机械通气预测风险评分:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 6;19(12):e0315281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315281. eCollection 2024.
5
The Hidden Heart: Exploring Cardiac Damage Post-Stroke: A Narrative Review.隐性心脏:探索卒中后心肌损伤:一篇叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 16;60(10):1699. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101699.
6
Stroke-heart syndrome: current progress and future outlook.中风-心脏综合征:当前的进展与未来展望。
J Neurol. 2024 Aug;271(8):4813-4825. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12480-4. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
7
Predictive factors for cerebrocardiac syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.重度创伤性脑损伤患者心脑综合征的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1192756. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1192756. eCollection 2023.
8
Advances in brain-heart syndrome: Attention to cardiac complications after ischemic stroke.脑心综合征的进展:关注缺血性中风后的心脏并发症。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;15:1053478. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1053478. eCollection 2022.
9
Blood Pressure Management for Ischemic Stroke in the First 24 Hours.缺血性脑卒中 24 小时内的血压管理。
Stroke. 2022 Apr;53(4):1074-1084. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036143. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Acute ischaemic stroke and its challenges for the intensivist.急性缺血性脑卒中及其对重症监护医生的挑战。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Mar 16;11(3):258-268. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac004.