Yang Zhiwei
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10N, King George V Building, Missenden Road, Sydney, PO Box M179, NSW, 2050, Australia.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 20;20(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06193-1.
Opioid analgesics are commonly used for controlling pain after total knee or hip replacement. However, it is unclear how much opioid should be prescribed at discharge after total hip and knee replacement surgery to optimize pain management but minimise adverse events. To determine the acceptability and feasibility of a trial comparing a reduced and standard opioid regimen following discharge from total knee or hip replacement.
This pilot randomized controlled trial recruited participants from the pre-admission clinic of a metropolitan hospital in Sydney. All participants received a non-opioid regimen of naproxen 500 mg 12 hourly for 7 days, and paracetamol 1000 mg 6 hourly daily for 14 days. Participants were randomly allocated to the 'standard' group (oxycodone 5 mg taken as needed, maximum recommended frequency of 4 hourly, 20 tablets dispensed) or the 'reduced' group (received half the amount of oxycodone, taken half as frequently) at hospital discharge. Primary outcomes were screening to recruitment rate, percentage completing follow-ups, and acceptability of the trial procedures. Acceptability was measured quantitatively at weeks 1 and 2 post-discharge and qualitatively by interview at 6 weeks post-discharge. Adverse events were collected up to 6-weeks post-discharge.
In four months, we screened 254 people, of which 72 were eligible and 53 were recruited (recruitment rate = 21%). 93% participants completed all their follow up surveys. Participants scored the trial intervention between neutral and acceptable (3.6/5 for both groups and weeks). 39 interviews were conducted where both clinicians and patients reported strong support for the pilot trial design. Few adverse events occurred across both groups, the most common being constipation.
This pilot trial indicated that a full-scale trial would be feasible and acceptable. Such a trial could provide evidence of comparative effectiveness for the reduced opioid regimen in this population.
The trial was pre-registered in Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623001070628).
阿片类镇痛药常用于控制全膝关节或全髋关节置换术后的疼痛。然而,对于全髋关节和膝关节置换术后出院时应开具多少阿片类药物以优化疼痛管理并减少不良事件尚不清楚。为了确定一项比较全膝关节或全髋关节置换术后出院时减少阿片类药物方案与标准阿片类药物方案的试验的可接受性和可行性。
这项试点随机对照试验从悉尼一家大都市医院的入院前诊所招募参与者。所有参与者均接受非阿片类药物方案,即萘普生500毫克,每12小时一次,共7天,对乙酰氨基酚1000毫克,每天每6小时一次,共14天。参与者在出院时被随机分配到“标准”组(按需服用羟考酮5毫克,最大推荐频率为每4小时一次,配发20片)或“减少”组(接受一半剂量的羟考酮,服用频率减半)。主要结局指标为筛选至招募率、完成随访的百分比以及试验程序的可接受性。在出院后第1周和第2周进行定量测量可接受性,在出院后6周通过访谈进行定性测量。收集出院后长达6周的不良事件。
在四个月内,我们筛选了254人,其中72人符合条件,53人被招募(招募率 = 21%)。93%的参与者完成了所有随访调查。参与者对试验干预的评分介于中性和可接受之间(两组在各周的评分为3.6/5)。进行了39次访谈,临床医生和患者均表示强烈支持试点试验设计。两组均很少发生不良事件,最常见的是便秘。
这项试点试验表明全面试验是可行且可接受的。这样的试验可以为该人群中减少阿片类药物方案的比较有效性提供证据。
该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12623001070628)进行预注册。