Suppr超能文献

依达拉奉治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症的疗效与安全性:该药安全但无法阻止病情进展。

Efficacy and Safety of Edaravone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: It is Safe but Does Not Stop Progression.

作者信息

Gupta Salil, Tomar Sunny, Soni Rahul, Anadure Ravi, Somashekhar Manoj, Singhal Anuj

机构信息

Consultant and Professor, Department of Neurology, King Hamad University Hospital, Capital Governorate, Bahrain, India, Corresponding Author, Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5181-6507.

Resident Internal Medicine, Department of Neurology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2025 Jul;73(7):68-71. doi: 10.59556/japi.73.1044.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Edaravone is recommended for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on a study showing an effect on a defined subset of patients.

AIM

To document the effect of edaravone in a cohort of ALS patients from India to find out if, after starting edaravone, there is a plateau period or significant slowing from baseline to compare results with existing literature.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective observational study with no control arm (due to ethical reasons). ALS patients >18 years of age, not requiring respiratory support or tube feeding, were included. All patients were given edaravone infusion in addition to standard of care and oral riluzole 50 mg twice daily. This consisted of giving the drug in monthly cycles over 6 months. The first cycle consisted of daily infusion of the drug for 14 days followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. From cycle 2 to cycle 6, the patients received the drug for the first 10 days of the month followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. The primary outcome was a significant change in Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were monthly change in ALSFRS-R scores when compared with the previous month and baseline, change in the first 3 months compared to the change in the next 3 months, adverse drug effects, and number of deaths. The study was registered with the Indian Council of Medical Research Clinical Trial Registry of India with the trial number CTRI/2019/11/021838. Paired -test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients received the drug along with riluzole. Twenty-three patients completed all six monthly infusions. Two died (3 months), two developed adverse reactions (3 months) and did not want further infusions (one had breathing difficulty and the other had hypotension during infusion). Two withdrew consent due to perceived poor effectiveness of the drug. The mean ALSFRS-R at baseline was 35.17 [standard deviation (SD) 8.01; range 20-46]. The primary outcome showed a significant decline in the mean last available ALSFRS-R score 6 months by -4.9 (SD 1.21) ( < 0.01). For the secondary outcome measure, mean monthly ALSFRS-R score was calculated before each infusion after excluding dropouts. There was a significant monthly decline in ALSFRS-R score: -0.93 (SD 0.58), -1.0 (-0.52), -0.90 (SD 0.71), -0.87 (SD 0.61), -0.82 (SD 0.57), -0.95 (SD 0.63), respectively ( < 0.001). There was also a progressive monthly decline when compared to baseline. The rate of decline in the first 3 months was the same as in the remaining 3 months: -2.5 (SD 0.73) vs -2.6 (SD 0.98) ( = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Edaravone infusion does not stop or significantly slow progression of disease from baseline but is safe.

摘要

背景

基于一项显示对特定患者亚组有疗效的研究,依达拉奉被推荐用于治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)。

目的

记录依达拉奉在一组印度ALS患者中的疗效,以确定在开始使用依达拉奉后是否存在平台期,或者与基线相比病情显著减缓,并将结果与现有文献进行比较。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性观察性研究,无对照臂(出于伦理原因)。纳入年龄大于18岁、不需要呼吸支持或鼻饲的ALS患者。所有患者除接受标准治疗和每日两次口服50mg利鲁唑外,还接受依达拉奉静脉输注。给药方案为在6个月内按月循环给药。第一个周期包括连续14天每日静脉输注药物,然后在当月剩余时间为无药间隔期。从第2周期到第6周期,患者在每月的前10天接受药物治疗,然后在当月剩余时间为无药间隔期。主要结局是6个月时修订的肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)评分较基线有显著变化。次要结局包括与前一个月和基线相比ALSFRS-R评分的每月变化、前3个月与后3个月变化的比较、药物不良反应以及死亡人数。该研究已在印度医学研究理事会印度临床试验注册中心注册,试验编号为CTRI/2019/11/021838。采用配对t检验进行统计分析。

结果

30例患者接受了依达拉奉联合利鲁唑治疗。23例患者完成了全部6次每月静脉输注。2例患者死亡(3个月时),2例出现不良反应(3个月时)且不想继续输注(1例在输注期间出现呼吸困难,另1例出现低血压)。2例因认为药物效果不佳而撤回同意书。基线时ALSFRS-R的平均评分为35.17[标准差(SD)8.01;范围20 - 46]。主要结局显示,6个月时最后一次可获得的ALSFRS-R平均评分显著下降了-4.9(SD 1.21)(P < 0.01)。对于次要结局指标,在排除退出者后,在每次输注前计算ALSFRS-R的平均每月评分。ALSFRS-R评分每月有显著下降:分别为-0.93(SD 0.58)、-1.0(SD 0.52)、-0.90(SD 0.71)、-0.87(SD 0.61)、-0.82(SD 0.57)、-0.95(SD 0.63)(P < 0.001)。与基线相比,每月也呈逐渐下降趋势。前3个月的下降速率与后3个月相同:-2.5(SD 0.73)对-2.6(SD 0.98)(P = 0.3)。

结论

依达拉奉静脉输注不能阻止疾病从基线开始的进展或使其显著减缓,但安全性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验