Liu Lee
College of Health, Science and Technology, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO, 64093, USA.
Ecohealth. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s10393-025-01737-7.
This paper investigates the role that sustainability played in shaping interstate difference in pandemic outcomes among the 50 states of the USA, in terms of standardized death rate from COVID-19 and excess death rates. Political ideology is currently a popular possible explanation for discrepancies among states in pandemic outcomes, given that Republican states tended to have higher death rates compared to Democratic ones. Additionally, partisan politics have been criticized for hindering the US pandemic response, especially in the early stages of the pandemic. However, this study demonstrates that the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) index may serve as a more significant predictor of the death and excess death rates among the US states than political affiliation. This suggests that it was not "red" or "blue," but rather "green" that was the most important factor in determining COVID-19 mortality. Pandemic lessons are lessons of sustainability.
本文从新冠疫情标准化死亡率和超额死亡率的角度,研究了可持续性在美国50个州的疫情结果中塑造州际差异方面所起的作用。鉴于共和党控制的州与民主党控制的州相比往往死亡率更高,政治意识形态目前是各州疫情结果差异的一个流行的可能解释。此外,党派政治因阻碍美国应对疫情而受到批评,尤其是在疫情初期。然而,这项研究表明,可持续发展目标(SDG)指数可能比政治派别更能显著预测美国各州的死亡率和超额死亡率。这表明,决定新冠疫情死亡率的最重要因素不是“红色”或“蓝色”,而是“绿色”。疫情教训就是可持续性的教训。