Wesley Moses John, Gundala Raja Hamesh, Shahid Muhammad Salman, Akbar Almas, Jeyakumar Deepapriya, Veluchamy Elakkiya, Sivakumar Manoj, Tahir Fizza, Jiménez Royg Diego, Pant Ramesh, Rehman Abdur
Internal Medicine, Annai Hospital, Thuraiyur, IND.
Medicine and Surgery, K.A.P. Viswanatham Government Medical College, Tiruchirappalli, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):e88443. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88443. eCollection 2025 Jul.
This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive neuroprotective therapies administered in combination with reperfusion treatments, either intravenous (IV) thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both, in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of four major databases was conducted with filters applied to include English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the last five years. From an initial 622 records, 10 eligible RCTs were identified and analyzed. Interventions included nerinetide, edaravone (and its derivatives), nelonemdaz, cerebrolysin, minocycline, glyceryl trinitrate, and normobaric hyperoxia. Functional outcomes were primarily measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), infarct volume, and safety endpoints such as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Among the findings, normobaric hyperoxia showed the most consistent benefit in reducing infarct size and improving functional outcomes, while agents such as nerinetide and edaravone demonstrated mixed results. Quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool revealed low to moderate risk of bias across most studies. Although the evidence remains heterogeneous, this review highlights the potential role of neuroprotective agents as adjuncts to reperfusion therapy and identifies promising directions for future clinical trials.
本系统评价评估了在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)成年患者中,辅助神经保护疗法与再灌注治疗(静脉溶栓、机械取栓或两者联合)联合使用的有效性和安全性。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对四个主要数据库进行了全面检索,并应用筛选条件纳入过去五年内发表的英文随机对照试验(RCT)。从最初的622条记录中,识别并分析了10项符合条件的RCT。干预措施包括依达拉奉(及其衍生物)、丁苯酞、脑蛋白水解物、米诺环素、硝酸甘油和常压高氧。功能结局主要使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)、梗死体积以及安全性终点(如症状性颅内出血[sICH])进行测量。在研究结果中,常压高氧在缩小梗死面积和改善功能结局方面显示出最一致的益处,而依达拉奉等药物的结果则好坏参半。使用Cochrane偏倚风险(RoB)2.0工具进行的质量评估显示,大多数研究的偏倚风险为低到中度。尽管证据仍然存在异质性,但本评价突出了神经保护剂作为再灌注治疗辅助手段的潜在作用,并为未来的临床试验确定了有前景的方向。