Department of Neuroscience, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA.
Division of Depression and Anxiety Disorders, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5900-5917. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02323-x. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
Can an inclusive test of face cognition meet or exceed the psychometric properties of a prominent less inclusive test? Here, we norm and validate an updated version of the influential Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), a clinically significant neuropsychiatric paradigm that has long been used to assess theory of mind and social cognition. Unlike the RMET, our Multiracial Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (MRMET) incorporates racially inclusive stimuli, nongendered answer choices, ground-truth referenced answers, and more accessible vocabulary. We show, via a series of large datasets, that the MRMET meets or exceeds RMET across major psychometric indices. Moreover, the reliable signal captured by the two tests is statistically indistinguishable, evidence for full interchangeability. We thus present the MRMET as a high-quality, inclusive, normed and validated alternative to the RMET, and as a case in point that inclusivity in psychometric tests of face cognition is an achievable aim. The MRMET test and our normative and validation data sets are openly available under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license at osf.io/ahq6n.
包容性的面孔认知测试能否达到或超越著名的非包容性测试的心理计量学特性?在这里,我们规范和验证了有影响力的“读心术眼测试”(Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test,RMET)的更新版本,这是一种具有临床意义的神经精神学范式,长期以来一直用于评估心理理论和社会认知。与 RMET 不同,我们的“多民族读心术眼测试”(Multiracial Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test,MRMET)纳入了种族包容性的刺激物、非性别化的答案选择、基于事实参考的答案和更易理解的词汇。我们通过一系列大型数据集表明,MRMET 在主要心理计量学指标上达到或超过了 RMET。此外,这两项测试所捕捉到的可靠信号在统计学上是不可区分的,这证明了它们可以完全互换。因此,我们将 MRMET 作为 RMET 的一种高质量、包容性、规范和验证的替代方案,并以此为例证明了在面孔认知的心理计量学测试中包容性是可以实现的目标。MRMET 测试及其规范性和验证性数据集根据 CC-BY-SA 4.0 许可证在 osf.io/ahq6n 上公开提供。