• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞尔维亚职业运动员在反兴奋剂知识方面的差异。

Differences in anti-doping knowledge among Serbian professional athletes.

作者信息

Vesic Zoran, Stojicevic Jelena, Rancic Nemanja, Milovanovic Gorica, Rasic Jelena S, Radivojevic Nenad, Prebeg Goran, Atanasov Dragan, Todorovic Milos, Marjanovic Sonja, Vesic Milica Vukasinovic

机构信息

Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;13:1625859. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1625859. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1625859
PMID:40843434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364880/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of anti-doping education among professional athletes on anti-doping knowledge.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on differences in knowledge toward doping among 404 professional athletes in relation to their education about doping.

RESULTS

Participants who underwent education answered correctly significantly more often on most of the questions compared to participants without education [difference of about 20-30% in the rate of correct answers is in favor of participants with education on every question; 8.49 (SD 2.75) vs. 11.04 (SD 1.89);  < 0.001]. The majority of participants in the group with prior education against doping answered 10 or more questions correctly out of a total of 13, while the group without prior education against doping most commonly had 7 to 11 correct answers ( < 0.001). The most significant predictors of correct answers are gender, number of years of training, type of sport (individual or team sport), and prior education about doping. The largest contribution to this model comes from the variable "prior education against doping," followed by the type of sport.

CONCLUSION

Our research shows that prior anti-doping education is effective and has the essential contribution on athletes' knowledge about doping.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨职业运动员中的反兴奋剂教育对反兴奋剂知识的影响。

方法

对404名职业运动员进行前瞻性队列研究,以了解他们在接受兴奋剂教育前后对兴奋剂知识的差异。

结果

与未接受教育的参与者相比,接受教育的参与者在大多数问题上回答正确的频率显著更高[每个问题的正确答案率相差约20%-30%,有利于接受教育的参与者;8.49(标准差2.75)对11.04(标准差1.89);<0.001]。在总共13个问题中,大多数接受过反兴奋剂教育的参与者正确回答了10个或更多问题,而未接受过反兴奋剂教育的参与者最常见的正确答案数量为7至11个(<0.001)。正确答案的最显著预测因素是性别、训练年限、运动类型(个人或团体运动)以及之前的反兴奋剂教育。该模型中最大的贡献来自“之前的反兴奋剂教育”变量,其次是运动类型。

结论

我们的研究表明,先前的反兴奋剂教育是有效的,并且对运动员的兴奋剂知识有重要贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/741e/12364880/17df9087026e/fpubh-13-1625859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/741e/12364880/17df9087026e/fpubh-13-1625859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/741e/12364880/17df9087026e/fpubh-13-1625859-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in anti-doping knowledge among Serbian professional athletes.塞尔维亚职业运动员在反兴奋剂知识方面的差异。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;13:1625859. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1625859. eCollection 2025.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Applying a systems thinking lens to anti-doping: A systematic review identifying the contributory factors to doping in sport.运用系统思维视角看待反兴奋剂问题:一项识别体育界使用兴奋剂促成因素的系统综述。
J Sports Sci. 2025 Jan;43(1):8-22. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2306056. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
7
Sleep Behaviors and Nutritional Knowledge in Amateur and Professional Combat Sport Athletes.业余和职业格斗运动员的睡眠行为和营养知识。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Sep 1;38(9):1627-1634. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004846. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Are dietary supplement users more likely to dope than non-users?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.膳食补充剂使用者比非使用者更有可能使用兴奋剂吗?:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jul;117:104077. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104077. Epub 2023 May 31.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Doping Prevalence among U.S. Elite Athletes Subject to Drug Testing under the World Anti-Doping Code.在《世界反兴奋剂条例》规定下接受药检的美国精英运动员中的兴奋剂使用流行情况。
Sports Med Open. 2024 May 20;10(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00721-9.
2
A national anti-doping education programme reduces doping susceptibility in British athletes.全国反兴奋剂教育计划降低了英国运动员的兴奋剂易感性。
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023 Nov;69:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102512. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Study of an Anti-Doping Education Program in Spanish Sports Sciences Students.
西班牙体育科学专业学生反兴奋剂教育方案研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316324.
4
Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.世界反兴奋剂机构电子学习计划在反兴奋剂教育方面的成效,涉及中国大学生运动员和非运动员对兴奋剂的认知、显性和隐性态度以及使用兴奋剂的可能性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Apr 26;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00459-1.
5
Attitudes Toward and Susceptibility to Doping in Spanish Elite and National-Standard Track and Field Athletes: An Examination of the Sport Drug Control Model.西班牙优秀和国家级田径运动员对使用兴奋剂的态度及易感性:运动药物控制模式研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 8;12:679001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679001. eCollection 2021.
6
Feasibility randomised controlled trial examining the effects of the Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application on doping knowledge and attitudes towards doping among grassroots coaches.一项可行性随机对照试验,研究教练教育中的反兴奋剂价值观(ADVICE)移动应用程序对基层教练的兴奋剂知识和对兴奋剂态度的影响。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Oct 1;6(1):e000800. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000800. eCollection 2020.
7
An intervention to optimise coach-created motivational climates and reduce athlete willingness to dope (CoachMADE): a three-country cluster randomised controlled trial.一项优化教练创造的激励氛围、降低运动员使用兴奋剂意愿的干预措施(CoachMADE):一项三国群组随机对照试验。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;55(4):213-219. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101963. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
An Italian Campaign to Promote Anti-doping Culture in High-School Students.一场在高中生中推广反兴奋剂文化的意大利运动。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 11;10:534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00534. eCollection 2019.
9
Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study.反兴奋剂教育和兴奋剂控制经验对日本大学生运动员反兴奋剂知识的影响:一项横断面研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Dec 5;13(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0178-x.
10
National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation.国家反兴奋剂预防指南:意图、效果及经验教训——一项为期4年的评估。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016 Oct 10;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9.