• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家反兴奋剂预防指南:意图、效果及经验教训——一项为期4年的评估。

National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation.

作者信息

Wippert Pia-Maria, Fließer Michael

机构信息

Sociology of Health and Physical Activity, Department of Health Science, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, House 12, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016 Oct 10;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9
PMID:27724975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5057456/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doping presents a potential health risk for young athletes. Prevention programs are intended to prevent doping by educating athletes about banned substances. However, such programs have their limitations in practice. This led Germany to introduce the National Doping Prevention Plan (NDPP), in hopes of ameliorating the situation among young elite athletes. Two studies examined 1) the degree to which the NDPP led to improved prevention efforts in elite sport schools, and 2) the extent to which newly developed prevention activities of the national anti-doping agency (NADA) based on the NDPP have improved knowledge among young athletes within elite sports schools.

METHODS

The first objective was investigated in a longitudinal study (Study I: t0 = baseline, t1 = follow-up 4 years after NDPP introduction) with N = 22 teachers engaged in doping prevention in elite sports schools. The second objective was evaluated in a cross-sectional comparison study (Study II) in N = 213 elite sports school students (54.5 % male, 45.5 % female, age M = 16.7 ± 1.3 years (all students had received the improved NDDP measure in school; one student group had received additionally NADA anti-doping activities and a control group did not). Descriptive statistics were calculated, followed by McNemar tests, Wilcoxon tests and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).

RESULTS

Results indicate that 4 years after the introduction of the NDPP there have been limited structural changes with regard to the frequency, type, and scope of doping prevention in elite sport schools. On the other hand, in study II, elite sport school students who received further NADA anti-doping activities performed better on an anti-doping knowledge test than students who did not take part (F(1, 207) = 33.99, p <0.001), although this difference was small.

CONCLUSION

The integration of doping-prevention in elite sport schools as part of the NDPP was only partially successful. The results of the evaluation indicate that the introduction of the NDPP has contributed more to a change in the content of doping prevention activities than to a structural transformation in anti-doping education in elite sport schools. Moreover, while students who did receive additional education in the form of the NDPP"booster sessions" had significantly more knowledge about doping than students who did not receive such education, this difference was only small and may not translate to actual behavior.

摘要

背景

使用兴奋剂对年轻运动员构成潜在的健康风险。预防计划旨在通过对运动员进行关于禁用物质的教育来防止使用兴奋剂。然而,此类计划在实践中存在局限性。这促使德国推出了国家反兴奋剂预防计划(NDPP),以期改善年轻精英运动员的状况。两项研究考察了:1)NDPP在多大程度上促使精英体育学校的预防工作得到改进;2)基于NDPP新开展的国家反兴奋剂机构(NADA)的预防活动在多大程度上提高了精英体育学校年轻运动员的相关知识水平。

方法

第一个目标在一项纵向研究(研究I:t0 =基线,t1 =引入NDPP后4年的随访)中进行调查,该研究涉及22名在精英体育学校从事反兴奋剂预防工作的教师。第二个目标在一项横断面比较研究(研究II)中进行评估,研究对象为213名精英体育学校学生(男性占54.5%,女性占45.5%,年龄M = 16.7±1.3岁(所有学生在学校都接受了改进后的NDDP措施;一个学生组额外接受了NADA反兴奋剂活动,而一个对照组未接受)。计算描述性统计量,随后进行麦克尼马尔检验、威尔科克森检验和协方差分析(ANCOVA)。

结果

结果表明,引入NDPP 4年后,精英体育学校在兴奋剂预防的频率、类型和范围方面的结构变化有限。另一方面,在研究II中,接受了额外NADA反兴奋剂活动的精英体育学校学生在反兴奋剂知识测试中的表现优于未参加的学生(F(1, 207) = 33.99,p <0.001),尽管这种差异很小。

结论

将兴奋剂预防纳入精英体育学校作为NDPP的一部分仅取得了部分成功。评估结果表明,NDPP的引入对兴奋剂预防活动内容的改变贡献更大,而不是对精英体育学校反兴奋剂教育的结构转变。此外,虽然接受了以NDPP“强化课程”形式的额外教育的学生比未接受此类教育的学生对兴奋剂的了解明显更多,但这种差异很小,可能不会转化为实际行为。

相似文献

1
National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation.国家反兴奋剂预防指南:意图、效果及经验教训——一项为期4年的评估。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016 Oct 10;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9.
2
["Enjoy the Sport - Schools against doping and drug dependence": a health education intervention in secondary schools].["享受运动——学校反对兴奋剂和药物依赖”:一项针对中学的健康教育干预措施]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2019 Jul-Aug;75(4):271-282.
3
Korean national athletes' knowledge, practices, and attitudes of doping: a cross-sectional study.韩国国家运动员对兴奋剂的认知、行为及态度:一项横断面研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Feb 14;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0092-7.
4
Doping knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Ugandan athletes': a cross-sectional study.乌干达运动员的兴奋剂知识、态度及行为:一项横断面研究
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Sep 22;10:37. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0033-2.
5
Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.运动中的兴奋剂:对精英运动员的态度、信念和知识的回顾。
Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x.
6
Doping control, providing whereabouts and the importance of privacy for elite athletes.兴奋剂控制、行踪申报和精英运动员的隐私权问题。
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Mar;25(2):212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
7
Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study.反兴奋剂教育和兴奋剂控制经验对日本大学生运动员反兴奋剂知识的影响:一项横断面研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Dec 5;13(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0178-x.
8
Australian athletes' knowledge of the WADA Prohibited Substances List and performance enhancing substances.澳大利亚运动员对世界反兴奋剂机构禁用物质清单和兴奋剂的了解情况。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Definition and outcome of a curriculum to prevent disordered eating and body-shaping drug use.预防饮食失调和使用塑形药物课程的定义与结果
J Sch Health. 2006 Feb;76(2):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00070.x.
10
An (un)desirable trade of harms? How elite athletes might react to medically supervised 'doping' and their considerations of side-effects in this situation.一种(非)理想的伤害交换?精英运动员在这种情况下对医学监督的“兴奋剂”可能会做出何种反应,以及他们对副作用的考虑。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:14-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in anti-doping knowledge among Serbian professional athletes.塞尔维亚职业运动员在反兴奋剂知识方面的差异。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;13:1625859. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1625859. eCollection 2025.
2
Answering the call for values-based anti-doping education-An evidence-informed intervention for elite adolescent athletes in Germany and Austria.响应基于价值观的反兴奋剂教育号召——一项针对德国和奥地利青少年精英运动员的循证干预措施。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Sep 23;4:859153. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.859153. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency's e-learning programme for anti-doping education on knowledge of, explicit and implicit attitudes towards, and likelihood of doping among Chinese college athletes and non-athletes.世界反兴奋剂机构电子学习计划在反兴奋剂教育方面的成效,涉及中国大学生运动员和非运动员对兴奋剂的认知、显性和隐性态度以及使用兴奋剂的可能性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Apr 26;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00459-1.
4
Efficient Ways to Combat Doping in a Sports Education Context!? A Systematic Review on Doping Prevention Measures Focusing on Young Age Groups.在体育教育背景下打击兴奋剂的有效方法!?关于针对年轻年龄组的兴奋剂预防措施的系统综述
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Dec 16;3:673452. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.673452. eCollection 2021.
5
Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: a cross-sectional study.反兴奋剂教育和兴奋剂控制经验对日本大学生运动员反兴奋剂知识的影响:一项横断面研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Dec 5;13(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0178-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis.个人和心理社会因素对体力活动中兴奋剂使用的预测:荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2014 Nov;44(11):1603-24. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0240-4.
2
Effectiveness of Anabolic Steroid Preventative Intervention among Gym Users: Applying Theory of Planned Behavior.合成代谢类固醇预防干预措施在健身房使用者中的有效性:应用计划行为理论
Health Promot Perspect. 2011 Jul 25;1(1):32-40. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2011.002. eCollection 2011.
3
Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.运动中的兴奋剂:对精英运动员的态度、信念和知识的回顾。
Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x.
4
The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions.增强学生社会情感学习的影响:基于学校的普遍干预措施的元分析。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):405-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.
5
[Interdisciplinary strategies versus doping].[跨学科策略与兴奋剂问题]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 Jun;122(11-12):325-33. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1383-4.
6
A meta-analytic review of school-based prevention for cannabis use.基于学校的大麻使用预防的元分析综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2010 Oct;37(5):709-23. doi: 10.1177/1090198110361315. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
7
Athletes' knowledge and views on OTC medication.运动员对非处方药的了解与看法。
Int J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;29(10):851-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038403. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
8
Dietary supplementation of high-performance Canadian athletes by age and gender.按年龄和性别对加拿大优秀运动员进行膳食补充
Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Nov;17(6):458-64. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31815aed33.
9
Doping use among tertiary education students in six developed countries.六个发达国家高等教育学生中的兴奋剂使用情况。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-0018-6.
10
Definition and outcome of a curriculum to prevent disordered eating and body-shaping drug use.预防饮食失调和使用塑形药物课程的定义与结果
J Sch Health. 2006 Feb;76(2):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00070.x.