• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠超声检查前评分的多中心分析:建立专用分类系统的时候了。

A Multicentric Analysis of a Pre-Ecographic Score in Pregnancy: Time for a Dedicated Classification System.

作者信息

Campobasso Gianluca, Castellana Fabio, Tempesta Annalisa, Bottai Alice, Scatigno Annachiara, Rizzo Elisa, Petrillo Francesca, Cappello Grazia, Piscitelli Prisco, Zupo Roberta

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy.

Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70100 Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Epidemiologia (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;6(3):39. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia6030039.

DOI:10.3390/epidemiologia6030039
PMID:40843698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12371941/
Abstract

: The objectives are to evaluate the influence of different maternal characteristics on ultrasound image quality and operator satisfaction, and to assess, preliminarily, a rating scale to stratify the difficulty level of ultrasound examination in early gestation. : A multicentric observational study of ultrasound scans was carried out on singleton pregnant women undergoing routine gestational ultrasound at 11-14 weeks and 19-21 weeks of gestation at two Prenatal Care Centers in the Apulia region (Southern Italy). Inclusion criteria included the presence of one or more limiting features, i.e., obesity, retroverted uterus, myomas, previous abdominal surgery, and limited echo-absorption. Each woman was given an overall pre-echographic limiting score from 0 to 9. The outcome measure was the operator's satisfaction with the examination, scored on a Likert scale. Nested linear regression models (raw, semi- and fully adjusted) were built for each of the two trimesters on the pre-ecographic limiting score (0-9 points) as dependent variables, with the operator's satisfaction as the regressor. : The whole sample included 445 pregnant women. The two-center samples did not show statistically different baseline features. The operator's satisfaction with the sonographic examination was significantly (and inversely) related to the pre-echographic limiting score, regardless of the mother's age, the operator performing the ultrasound, the Hospital Center where the ultrasound examination was performed, and the duration of the sonographic examination. : A number of maternal conditions need to be monitored for good ultrasound performance; using a specific rating scale to stratify the level of difficulty of the ultrasound examination at early gestation could represent a potentially useful tool, although it requires further validation.

摘要

目的是评估不同孕妇特征对超声图像质量和操作者满意度的影响,并初步评估一种用于对早孕期超声检查难度水平进行分层的评分量表。

在意大利南部普利亚地区的两个产前护理中心,对在妊娠11 - 14周和19 - 21周接受常规妊娠超声检查的单胎孕妇进行了一项多中心超声扫描观察性研究。纳入标准包括存在一个或多个限制因素,即肥胖、子宫后倾、肌瘤、既往腹部手术史和回声吸收受限。每位女性在超声检查前获得一个从0到9的总体限制评分。结局指标是操作者对检查的满意度,采用李克特量表评分。针对两个孕期中的每一个,以超声检查前限制评分(0 - 9分)作为因变量,以操作者满意度作为回归变量,建立了嵌套线性回归模型(原始模型、半调整模型和完全调整模型)。

整个样本包括445名孕妇。两个中心的样本在基线特征方面没有显示出统计学上的差异。无论母亲年龄、进行超声检查的操作者、进行超声检查的医院中心以及超声检查的时长如何,操作者对超声检查的满意度与超声检查前限制评分显著(且呈负相关)相关。

为了获得良好的超声检查效果,需要对一些孕妇情况进行监测;使用特定的评分量表对早孕期超声检查的难度水平进行分层可能是一个潜在有用的工具,尽管它需要进一步验证。

相似文献

1
A Multicentric Analysis of a Pre-Ecographic Score in Pregnancy: Time for a Dedicated Classification System.妊娠超声检查前评分的多中心分析:建立专用分类系统的时候了。
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;6(3):39. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia6030039.
2
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
3
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation.24 周妊娠前常规胎儿评估超声检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8(8):CD014698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014698.
4
Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.为改善孕产妇和新生儿结局而激励女性增加产前检查的使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;2015(12):CD009916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2.
5
Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes.改善双胎妊娠结局的超声监测方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 7;11(11):CD011371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011371.pub2.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
8
Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).足月(37周及以上)胎膜早破时计划早产与期待治疗(等待)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD005302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3.
9
Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term.孕34周直至足月时高血压疾病的计划早产与期待治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 15;1(1):CD009273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2.
10
Cell salvage for the management of postpartum haemorrhage.采用细胞回收技术管理产后出血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD016120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016120.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians.超声生物学效应综述:给临床医生的关键信息
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(5):855. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050855.
2
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan.国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)实践指南(更新版):孕中期常规胎儿超声检查的实施
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):840-856. doi: 10.1002/uog.24888. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review.超重、肥胖和孕期体重过度增加作为不良妊娠结局的危险因素:一项叙述性综述。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Apr;35(2):250-264. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12999. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
4
Uterine Fibroids and Pregnancy: How Do They Affect Each Other?子宫肌瘤与妊娠:它们如何相互影响?
Reprod Sci. 2022 Aug;29(8):2145-2151. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00656-6. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
The effect of maternal body mass index on fetal ultrasound image quality.孕妇体重指数对胎儿超声图像质量的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):200-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.248. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
6
Investigating the use of ultrasonography for the antenatal diagnosis of structural congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家中超声检查用于产前诊断结构性先天性异常的研究:一项系统评价
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Aug 20;4(1):e000684. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000684. eCollection 2020.
7
Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology.会议记录:超越超声——妇产科超声影像质量改进第一论坛。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.033. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
8
Correlation between pre-pregnancy body mass index and maternal visceral adiposity with fetal biometry during the second trimester.孕前期体重指数和孕妇内脏脂肪与孕中期胎儿生物测量学之间的相关性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;138(2):133-137. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12202. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Risk of Abdominal Surgery in Pregnancy Among Women Who Have Undergone Bariatric Surgery.接受过减肥手术的女性在孕期进行腹部手术的风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):887-895. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001975.
10
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.孕早期胎儿评估的超声检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD007058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007058.pub3.