Nguyen Anh D, Brosheit Sina, Vordermark Dirk, Bitter Kerstin, Gerlach Reinhard, Gernhardt Christian R
University Outpatient Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Department of Radiotherapy, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Am J Dent. 2025 Feb;38(1):15-21.
To evaluate the laboratory microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of universal adhesives applied in etch-and-rinse mode on irradiated and sound human dentin.
Dentin specimens of 135 freshly extracted human third molars were divided in three superordinate groups. Each tooth received either no irradiation (control group), 5 Gy (2 Gy/2 Gy/1 Gy in 3 consecutive days) or the high-level therapeutic dose of 60 Gy (test groups) applied fractionally (2 Gy/day, 5 days/week, 6 weeks). Samples from each group were randomly divided into three subgroups assigned to three established universal adhesives (Futurabond U, AdheSE Universal, Xeno Select) in just the etch-and-rinse application mode (n= 15). Bond strength was assessed with a universal testing machine 15 minutes after application and light curing of the adhesive materials. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA (P< 0.01) and Tukey's test (P< 0.05).
Regarding all experimental groups ANOVA showed significant effects on µTBS of dentin irradiation and the used adhesives (P< 0.01, ANOVA). In nearly all groups, a decrease of µTBS was observed when used on highly irradiated dentin. However, comparing the different groups, no significant influence of high-level radiation on the microtensile bond strength of the three universal adhesives assessed in etch-and-rinse application mode could be determined (P> 0.05, Tukey's test).
Within the limitations of this laboratory study, no significant effects of low- and high-level tumor irradiation on the bond strength of universal adhesives can be detected after application in etch-and-rinse mode. Consequently, this mode of application may be considered a viable option for patients who have undergone radiation therapy when using universal adhesive systems for luting restorative materials.
评估以酸蚀冲洗模式应用于经照射和未照射的人牙本质的通用型粘结剂的实验室微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)。
将135颗新鲜拔除的人第三磨牙的牙本质样本分为三个上级组。每颗牙齿要么不接受照射(对照组),要么接受5 Gy(连续3天,每天2 Gy,共2 Gy/2 Gy/1 Gy)或60 Gy的高剂量治疗性照射(试验组),分次照射(每天2 Gy,每周5天,共6周)。每组样本随机分为三个亚组,分别使用三种既定的通用型粘结剂(Futurabond U、AdheSE Universal、Xeno Select),采用酸蚀冲洗应用模式(n = 15)。在粘结剂材料应用并光固化15分钟后,使用万能试验机评估粘结强度。采用双向方差分析(P < 0.01)和Tukey检验(P < 0.05)进行统计分析。
对于所有实验组,方差分析显示牙本质照射和所使用的粘结剂对µTBS有显著影响(P < 0.01,方差分析)。在几乎所有组中,当用于高剂量照射的牙本质时,观察到µTBS降低。然而,比较不同组时,未发现高剂量辐射对以酸蚀冲洗应用模式评估的三种通用型粘结剂的微拉伸粘结强度有显著影响(P > 0.05,Tukey检验)。
在本实验室研究的局限性内,在酸蚀冲洗模式应用后,未检测到低剂量和高剂量肿瘤照射对通用型粘结剂粘结强度有显著影响。因此,当使用通用型粘结剂系统粘结修复材料时,这种应用模式对于接受过放射治疗的患者可能是一个可行的选择。