Tavukçu Demet, Kaya Sultan
Faculty of Education, Maltepe University, İstanbul, 34843, Turkey.
Research Institute for the Handicapped, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-07024-2.
People around individuals with autism spectrum disorders, such as their families or teachers, use multiple sources of information, either concurrently or sequentially, to obtain autism-related information. Recently, social media platforms have become primary sources of information. However, these sources may provide information that is either accurate or inaccurate. In this study, information regarding the causes and interventions of autism spectrum disorder disseminated through X was examined and discussed in line with the literature. A total of 6,861 tweets posted between January 2000 and October 2022 were collected and filtered, resulting in 4,805 unique tweets. Using a lexicon-based factual classification approach, each tweet was labeled as accurate, inaccurate, or neutral based on its alignment with established scientific literature. Tweets labeled as neutral were subsequently excluded from further analysis, resulting in a final dataset of 3,114 tweets. The lexicon-based sentiment analysis revealed that 78.6% of tweets related to the causes of ASD were classified as inaccurate, while only 21.4% were classified as accurate. Similarly, 57.9% of tweets concerning interventions were inaccurate, whereas 42.1% were accurate. The autism-related information available on X reaches a broad audience. However, the findings highlight the persistent challenges in addressing misinformation about ASD on social media platforms, emphasizing the urgent need for strategies that foster accurate, evidence-based discourse.
自闭症谱系障碍患者周围的人,如他们的家人或教师,会同时或相继使用多种信息来源来获取与自闭症相关的信息。最近,社交媒体平台已成为主要的信息来源。然而,这些来源提供的信息可能准确,也可能不准确。在本研究中,根据文献对通过X传播的有关自闭症谱系障碍病因和干预措施的信息进行了审查和讨论。收集并筛选了2000年1月至2022年10月期间发布的总共6861条推文,最终得到4805条独特的推文。使用基于词典的事实分类方法,根据每条推文与既定科学文献的匹配程度,将其标记为准确、不准确或中性。标记为中性的推文随后被排除在进一步分析之外,最终得到一个包含3114条推文的数据集。基于词典的情感分析显示,与自闭症谱系障碍病因相关的推文中,78.6%被归类为不准确,而只有21.4%被归类为准确。同样,关于干预措施的推文中,57.9%不准确,42.1%准确。X上提供的与自闭症相关的信息受众广泛。然而,研究结果凸显了在社交媒体平台上解决有关自闭症谱系障碍错误信息方面持续存在的挑战,强调迫切需要采取策略来促进准确、基于证据的讨论。