Suppr超能文献

英格兰的社会经济剥夺及其与多重用药的关联:一项全国横断面调查的结果

Socioeconomic deprivation and its association with polypharmacy in England: results from a national cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Adebisi Yusuff Adebayo, Alshahrani Najim Z, Bafail Duaa Abdullah

机构信息

College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01990-4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Polypharmacy is a growing public health concern, yet its association with area-level socioeconomic deprivation in England has been under-explored.

AIM

To investigate whether socioeconomic deprivation, measured by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), is associated with polypharmacy among adults.

METHOD

We analysed cross-sectional data from the 2021 Health Survey for England, including 1705 adults aged 16+ who completed nurse visits and reported prescribed medication use in the past week. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of five or more prescribed medications. IMD scores were categorised into quintiles (least to most deprived). Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, multimorbidity, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, and GP visit frequency. A polynomial contrast test assessed linear trends, and adjusted predicted probabilities were calculated to illustrate the deprivation-polypharmacy gradient.

RESULTS

In the fully adjusted model, adults residing in the most deprived IMD quintile had significantly higher odds of polypharmacy (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.09-3.04; p = 0.022) compared to those living in the least deprived areas. No statistically significant associations were observed for intermediate quintiles. A polynomial contrast test confirmed a significant linear trend across IMD levels (p = 0.010), indicating that the odds of polypharmacy increased progressively with greater area-level deprivation. This gradient was further illustrated by adjusted predicted probabilities, which rose from 18.3% (95% CI 15.3-21.3%) in the least deprived quintile to 24.6% (95% CI 20.1-29.2%) in the most deprived (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic deprivation is independently associated with polypharmacy, even after adjusting for multimorbidity and other confounders, highlighting persistent health inequalities within England's healthcare system. Targeted strategies, including regular medication reviews and enhanced access to care in deprived communities, may help mitigate risks and promote equity in prescribing practices.

摘要

引言

多重用药问题日益引起公众对健康的关注,但其与英格兰地区层面社会经济贫困的关联尚未得到充分研究。

目的

调查以多重贫困指数(IMD)衡量的社会经济贫困是否与成年人的多重用药有关。

方法

我们分析了2021年英格兰健康调查的横断面数据,包括1705名年龄在16岁及以上完成护士访视并报告在过去一周使用过处方药的成年人。多重用药定义为使用五种或更多种处方药。IMD得分分为五个五分位数(从最不贫困到最贫困)。多变量逻辑回归估计调整后的比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI),并控制年龄、性别、种族、多种疾病、肥胖、吸烟、饮酒和全科医生就诊频率。多项式对比检验评估线性趋势,并计算调整后的预测概率以说明贫困与多重用药之间的梯度。

结果

在完全调整模型中,与生活在最不贫困地区的成年人相比,居住在最贫困IMD五分位数的成年人多重用药的几率显著更高(OR 1.82;95% CI 1.09 - 3.04;p = 0.022)。中间五分位数未观察到统计学上的显著关联。多项式对比检验证实了IMD水平之间存在显著的线性趋势(p = 0.010),表明多重用药的几率随着地区层面贫困程度的增加而逐渐上升。调整后的预测概率进一步说明了这种梯度,从最不贫困五分位数的18.3%(95% CI 15.3 - 21.3%)上升到最贫困五分位数的24.6%(95% CI 20.1 - 29.2%)(p < 0.001)。

结论

即使在调整了多种疾病和其他混杂因素之后,社会经济贫困仍与多重用药独立相关,这凸显了英格兰医疗保健系统中持续存在的健康不平等现象。有针对性的策略,包括定期药物审查和改善贫困社区的医疗服务可及性,可能有助于降低风险并促进处方实践中的公平性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验