• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为降低接受根治性手术的胰腺癌患者出现假N0的风险而获取的最佳淋巴结数量

Optimal Number of Lymph Nodes Retrieved to Lower the Risk of False N0 for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Curative Surgery.

作者信息

Yoon So Jeong, Hong Seung Soo, Park Boram, Kim Sung Hyun, Kang Chang Moo, Kim Kyung Sik, Shin Sang Hyun, Han In Woong, Heo Jin Seok, Hwang Ho Kyoung, Kim Hongbeom

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18029-7.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-18029-7
PMID:40849376
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate LN examination is critical for staging and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. However, the ideal number of LNs required for precise staging and improved survival remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of lymph nodes (LNs) to retrieve during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer to minimize false node-negative (false N0) rates and assess its impact on survival outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from patients undergoing curative-intent upfront surgery for pancreatic cancer at two tertiary centers in South Korea (2010-2021). An exploration cohort of 808 patients was used to identify LN retrieval thresholds, and the results were validated in an independent cohort of 444 patients. The study excluded patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or had fewer than two retrieved LNs. False N0 rates and 5 year overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the exploration cohort, examining 16 LNs reduced the false N0 rate to 18.9%, whereas in the validation cohort, retrieving 12 LNs resulted in a false N0 rate of 19.5%. Among the node-negative (N0) patients, retrieving up to 21 LNs was associated with improved 5 year overall survival. Differences in cutoff values between cohorts were attributed to demographic variations and inclusion of fewer LNs retrieved but higher detection of metastatic nodes in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrieving a sufficient number of LNs during pancreatectomy is essential to reducing false N0 rates and improving survival outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients. These findings highlight the need for standardized LN evaluation protocols and support further prospective, multi-center studies to optimize staging accuracy.

摘要

背景

准确的淋巴结检查对于胰腺癌的分期和预后至关重要。然而,精确分期和改善生存所需的理想淋巴结数量仍不明确。本研究旨在确定胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术中获取的最佳淋巴结数量,以尽量减少假阴性淋巴结(假N0)率,并评估其对生存结果的影响。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究分析了韩国两个三级中心(2010 - 2021年)接受胰腺癌根治性前期手术患者的数据。一个由808名患者组成的探索性队列用于确定淋巴结获取阈值,并在一个444名患者的独立队列中验证结果。该研究排除了接受新辅助治疗或获取的淋巴结少于两个的患者。分析了假N0率和5年总生存率。

结果

在探索性队列中,检查16个淋巴结可将假N0率降至18.9%,而在验证性队列中,获取12个淋巴结导致假N0率为19.5%。在淋巴结阴性(N0)患者中,获取多达21个淋巴结与改善5年总生存率相关。队列之间截断值的差异归因于人口统计学差异以及验证性队列中获取的淋巴结较少但转移淋巴结的检出率较高。

结论

在胰十二指肠切除术中获取足够数量的淋巴结对于降低胰腺癌患者的假N0率和改善生存结果至关重要。这些发现凸显了标准化淋巴结评估方案的必要性,并支持进一步开展前瞻性多中心研究以优化分期准确性。

相似文献

1
Optimal Number of Lymph Nodes Retrieved to Lower the Risk of False N0 for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Curative Surgery.为降低接受根治性手术的胰腺癌患者出现假N0的风险而获取的最佳淋巴结数量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18029-7.
2
Inverse effects of lymph node count on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer based on lymph node positivity status post-neoadjuvant CRT: a large-volume Chinese center experience.基于新辅助放化疗后淋巴结阳性状态的直肠癌淋巴结计数对肿瘤学结局的相反影响:来自中国大型中心的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul 25;40(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04913-x.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
6
SEER-based evaluation of lymph node yield as a prognostic indicator of cancer-specific survival in nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.基于监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库评估淋巴结获取数量作为非转移性胰腺导管腺癌癌症特异性生存预后指标的研究
Pancreatology. 2025 Jun;25(4):558-568. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.008. Epub 2025 May 16.
7
PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer.正电子发射断层显像-计算机断层扫描用于评估疑似可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的纵隔淋巴结受累情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13;2014(11):CD009519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009519.pub2.
8
The Association between the Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes and Survival in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Dutch Population-Based Study.胃癌手术中淋巴结清扫数量与生存的关联:一项基于荷兰人群的研究
Dig Surg. 2025 May 19:1-14. doi: 10.1159/000546436.
9
Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses.术中冰冻切片分析用于诊断可疑盆腔肿块中的早期卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 1;3(3):CD010360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010360.pub2.
10
Detection of disseminated lung cancer cells in regional lymph nodes by assay of CK19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and its clinical significance.通过细胞角蛋白19逆转录聚合酶链反应检测区域淋巴结中播散性肺癌细胞及其临床意义。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct;131(10):662-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-005-0009-0. Epub 2005 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Factors for Early Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胰腺癌切除术后早期复发的预后因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Oct;167(5):977-992. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.028. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
N, LNR or LODDS: Which Is the Most Appropriate Lymph Node Classification Scheme for Patients with Radically Resected Pancreatic Cancer?N、LNR还是LODDS:哪种是根治性切除胰腺癌患者最合适的淋巴结分类方案?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 6;14(7):1834. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071834.
3
Appraisal of 5-year recurrence-free survival after surgery in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
胰腺导管腺癌术后5年无复发生存率评估。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Mar;28(3):287-296. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.815. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Resected Pancreatic Cancer With N2 Node Involvement Is Refractory to Gemcitabine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy.N2 淋巴结转移的可切除胰腺癌对吉西他滨为基础的辅助化疗具有抵抗性。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820915947. doi: 10.1177/1073274820915947.
5
Lymph node ratio as valuable predictor in pancreatic cancer treated with R0 resection and adjuvant treatment.淋巴结比率是 R0 切除和辅助治疗胰腺癌的有价值的预测指标。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):952. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6193-0.
6
Significance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Resected Stage I-II Pancreatic Cancer-More is Better? A Large International Population-based Cohort Study.在根治性切除的 I 期- II 期胰腺癌中,检查淋巴结数量对准确分期和长期生存的意义——更多更好?一项大型国际基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e554-e563. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003558.
7
Determining the optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer: An analysis using the nodal staging score model.确定用于准确分期胰腺癌的最佳检查淋巴结数量:使用淋巴结分期评分模型的分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):1069-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Pancreatic Cancer Lymph Node Resection Revisited: A Novel Calculation of Number of Lymph Nodes Required.胰腺癌淋巴结清扫术的再探讨:一种新的所需淋巴结数量的计算方法。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):662-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.031. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.FOLFIRINOX 或吉西他滨作为胰腺癌的辅助治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2395-2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775.
10
Increased pancreatic cancer survival with greater lymph node retrieval in the National Cancer Data Base.在国家癌症数据库中,增加淋巴结清扫数量可提高胰腺癌患者生存率。
Am J Surg. 2017 Sep;214(3):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.036. Epub 2017 Jul 1.