Suppr超能文献

确定用于准确分期胰腺癌的最佳检查淋巴结数量:使用淋巴结分期评分模型的分析。

Determining the optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer: An analysis using the nodal staging score model.

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.

Department of Surgery, The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):1069-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer using the nodal staging score model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data for patients with resected pancreatic cancer were collected from SEER database (development cohort [DC]) and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center database (validation cohort [VC]). Multivariable models were constructed to assess how the number of ELNs was associated with stage migration and overall survival (OS). Using the β-binomial distribution, we developed a nodal staging score model from the DC and tested it with the VC.

RESULTS

Both cohorts exhibited significant proportional increases from node-negative to node-positive disease (DC: odds ratio [OR], 1.047; P < 0.001; VC: OR, 1.035; P < 0.001) and improved OS (DC: hazard ratio [HR], 0.982; P < 0.001; VC: HR, 0.979; P < 0.001) as ELNs increased. Nodal staging scores escalated separately as ELNs increased for different tumor (T) stages, with plateaus at 16, 21, and 23 LNs (cut-offs) for T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that examining more LNs than the corresponding cut-off value was a significant survival predictor (DC: HR, 0.813; P < 0.001; VC: HR, 0.696; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

The optimal number of ELNs for adequate staging of pancreatic cancer was related to T stage. We recommend examining at least 16, 21, and 23 LNs for T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively, as a nodal staging quality measure for both surgery and pathological analysis.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在使用淋巴结分期评分模型确定用于准确分期胰腺癌的最佳检查淋巴结(ELN)数量。

材料与方法

从 SEER 数据库(开发队列 [DC])和复旦大学上海癌症中心数据库(验证队列 [VC])收集接受胰腺切除术的胰腺癌患者的临床病理数据。构建多变量模型以评估 ELN 的数量与分期迁移和总生存(OS)的关系。使用β-二项式分布,我们从 DC 开发了一个淋巴结分期评分模型,并在 VC 中进行了测试。

结果

两个队列均显示出从淋巴结阴性到淋巴结阳性疾病的显著比例增加(DC:优势比 [OR],1.047;P<0.001;VC:OR,1.035;P<0.001)和 OS 改善(DC:风险比 [HR],0.982;P<0.001;VC:HR,0.979;P<0.001)随着 ELN 的增加而增加。随着 ELN 的增加,淋巴结分期评分分别升高,对于不同的肿瘤(T)期,分别在 16、21 和 23 个淋巴结(截止值)处达到平台期,分别用于 T1、T2 和 T3 肿瘤。多变量分析表明,检查的淋巴结数超过相应的截止值是生存的显著预测因素(DC:HR,0.813;P<0.001;VC:HR,0.696;P=0.028)。

结论

用于充分分期胰腺癌的最佳 ELN 数量与 T 期有关。我们建议分别检查至少 16、21 和 23 个淋巴结用于 T1、T2 和 T3 肿瘤,作为手术和病理分析的淋巴结分期质量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验