• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力残疾青年的医疗保健利用情况以及医疗保健获取的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。

Healthcare Utilisation and Barriers and Facilitators of Healthcare Access for Young People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Kreps Felicia, Wijekulasuriya Shalini, Zurynski Yvonne, Mitchell Rebecca

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1111/jir.70033.

DOI:10.1111/jir.70033
PMID:40851499
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Young people with intellectual disability may exhibit poorer general health, higher mortality rates and greater limitations from physical or mental illnesses compared to the general population. It is important to understand how this may relate to healthcare utilisation, including factors influencing healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability. This systematic review aimed to examine healthcare utilisation and to identify common barriers and facilitators of healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability.

METHOD

Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched from 1 January 2013 to 31 October 2024 to identify articles that examined healthcare utilisation for young people (≤ 18 years old) with intellectual disability. Abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers; data from included articles were critically appraised.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included for synthesis and focused on utilisation of hospital inpatient services (n = 22), emergency department (ED) services (n = 13), mental health or psychiatric services (n = 7) and mental health day programmes or outreach services (n = 1). Young people with intellectual disability generally had a higher proportion of hospital admissions, ED visits, hospital length of stay, mental health outpatient visits, mortality, 30-day hospital readmission and complications of care, compared to young people without intellectual disability. Common facilitators of healthcare access and engagement included having health insurance coverage and the use of visual aids and tools for the young person with intellectual disability. Barriers included low socio-economic status and poor provider communication and knowledge about intellectual disability.

CONCLUSIONS

There are clear disparities in health service outcomes for young people with intellectual disability compared to the general population, which may be influenced by socio-cultural factors and access to knowledgeable and empathetic healthcare providers. Targeted education for healthcare providers may enhance the provision of high-quality care and improve healthcare utilisation and health outcomes for young people with intellectual disability.

摘要

背景

与普通人群相比,智障青年可能总体健康状况较差、死亡率较高,且因身体或精神疾病而受到的限制更大。了解这与医疗保健利用之间的关系很重要,包括影响智障青年获得医疗保健的因素。本系统评价旨在研究医疗保健利用情况,并确定智障青年获得医疗保健的常见障碍和促进因素。

方法

检索了五个数据库(MEDLINE、Scopus、EMBASE、PsycINFO和CINAHL),检索时间为2013年1月1日至2024年10月31日,以确定研究智障青年(≤18岁)医疗保健利用情况的文章。由两名评审员进行摘要和全文筛选;对纳入文章的数据进行严格评估。

结果

纳入33项研究进行综合分析,重点关注医院住院服务(n = 22)、急诊科(ED)服务(n = 13)、心理健康或精神科服务(n = 7)以及心理健康日间项目或外展服务(n = 1)的利用情况。与非智障青年相比,智障青年的住院率、急诊就诊率、住院时间、心理健康门诊就诊率、死亡率、30天再住院率和护理并发症比例普遍较高。获得医疗保健和参与医疗保健的常见促进因素包括有医疗保险覆盖,以及为智障青年使用视觉辅助工具。障碍包括社会经济地位低,以及医疗服务提供者沟通不良和对智障缺乏了解。

结论

与普通人群相比,智障青年的卫生服务结果存在明显差异,这可能受到社会文化因素以及是否能获得知识渊博且富有同情心的医疗服务提供者的影响。对医疗服务提供者进行有针对性的教育,可能会提高为智障青年提供的高质量护理水平,改善医疗保健利用情况和健康结果。

相似文献

1
Healthcare Utilisation and Barriers and Facilitators of Healthcare Access for Young People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.智力残疾青年的医疗保健利用情况以及医疗保健获取的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1111/jir.70033.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
6
Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis.临床接触中的影响儿童和青少年心理健康服务风险评估的因素:快速现实主义综合评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(1):1-107. doi: 10.3310/VKTY5822.
7
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
8
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.