Sathiadas Manoji Gitanjali, Antonyraja Annieston, Viswalingam Arunath, Arunthavavinajagamoorthy Shubanki
University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Aug 20;12:30502225251362014. doi: 10.1177/30502225251362014. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Violent forms of discipline (VFD) used in homes and schools to correct children's behaviour have significant long-term consequences, leading to their prohibition in most countries. This study focused on understanding school children's perspectives on VFD. A community-based cross-sectional study surveyed 16 to 19-year-olds using random sampling. Out of 1130 participants, 60.7% reported experiencing violent punishment at least once during a school term. Physical punishment was most common (64.5%), followed by psychological methods (27.1%). Interestingly, 85% of students were aware of their rights under the child's charter, and all knew emergency contact numbers. An overwhelming 86.3% preferred alternative disciplinary methods, believing VFD negatively impacts their future development. Participants with better knowledge supported legal measures against VFD ( < .05). The differences in prevalence when compared to other studies indicate that cultural background might influence acceptance of such practices. These findings underscore the importance of promoting non-violent disciplinary strategies to safeguard children's well-being and development.
家庭和学校中用于纠正儿童行为的暴力管教形式(VFD)会产生重大的长期后果,这导致大多数国家都禁止使用此类方式。本研究着重于了解在校儿童对暴力管教形式的看法。一项基于社区的横断面研究通过随机抽样对16至19岁的青少年进行了调查。在1130名参与者中,60.7%报告称在一学期内至少经历过一次暴力惩罚。体罚最为常见(64.5%),其次是心理方法(27.1%)。有趣的是,85%的学生知晓其在儿童宪章下的权利,并且都知道紧急联系电话。高达86.3%的学生更喜欢替代性的管教方法,认为暴力管教形式会对他们未来的发展产生负面影响。知识水平较高的参与者支持针对暴力管教形式的法律措施(<0.05)。与其他研究相比,患病率的差异表明文化背景可能会影响对此类做法的接受程度。这些发现强调了推广非暴力管教策略以保障儿童福祉和发展的重要性。