Suppr超能文献

学校体罚的系统评价:全球流行率及相关因素。

A Systematic Review of Corporal Punishment in Schools: Global Prevalence and Correlates.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):52-72. doi: 10.1177/1524838020925787. Epub 2020 May 21.

Abstract

Despite global shifts toward prevention of school corporal punishment, the practice remains widespread. This systematic review focused on (a) prevalence, (b) associated mental health and behavioral factors, and (c) correlates that may be risk or protective factors. Studies included in this review were peer-reviewed, published in English between 1980 and July 2017, and quantitative in design. Fifty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. All were cross-sectional surveys, predominantly of moderate quality and conducted in the United States (US) and on the African continent. Results indicated that school corporal punishment is prevalent across the globe (including where bans are in place) and does not appear to be decreasing over time, although measurement differences preclude firm conclusions. It is associated with physical, academic, mental health, and behavioral problems for children. Boys, Black students (in the US), and students exposed to violence at home were most at risk of corporal punishment. It is unclear whether disability puts a student at risk. Schools with high rates of other disciplinary practices were more likely to use corporal punishment, while those who employed a mental health professional and trained staff in safety procedures were less likely to use corporal punishment. Teacher attitudes favoring corporal punishment, and their use of violence in other contexts, increased risk. Low socioeconomic status (of the student or the school environment) increased risk, while high levels of state social capital reduced risk. Future research must include areas where corporal punishment is banned and focus on developing effective interventions to prevent school corporal punishment.

摘要

尽管全球范围内都在转向预防学校体罚,但这种做法仍然很普遍。本系统评价主要关注:(a) 流行率;(b) 相关的心理健康和行为因素;(c) 可能是风险或保护因素的相关因素。本综述纳入的研究均为同行评审、发表于 1980 年至 2017 年 7 月期间的英文文献,且为定量设计。共有 53 篇论文符合纳入标准。这些论文均为横断面调查,主要来自美国和非洲,质量中等。结果表明,全球范围内学校体罚普遍存在(包括在已经禁止体罚的地方),且似乎并未随着时间的推移而减少,尽管由于测量方法的差异,无法得出确切的结论。体罚与儿童的身体、学业、心理健康和行为问题有关。男孩、美国的非裔学生和在家中遭受暴力的学生最容易遭受体罚。残疾是否会使学生面临风险尚不清楚。其他纪律处分措施实施率较高的学校更有可能使用体罚,而那些聘请心理健康专业人员并对员工进行安全程序培训的学校则不太可能使用体罚。教师赞成体罚的态度,以及他们在其他情况下使用暴力,都会增加风险。学生或学校环境的社会经济地位较低会增加风险,而州社会资本水平较高则会降低风险。未来的研究必须包括已经禁止体罚的地区,并专注于制定有效的干预措施来预防学校体罚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验