Shaw S T, Miller J M
Clin Lab Med. 1985 Dec;5(4):725-52.
Hospital laboratories and hospital-independent reference laboratories will need to change in order to provide comprehensive, medically appropriate, and reasonably priced laboratory services in the cost-containment age we are entering. The change must be economically and technologically innovative and relevant to society's next generation of health care needs. Hospital laboratories and commercial laboratories may become weaker or stronger relative to one another, but our guess is that they will ultimately become more like one another or even may join forces to provide optimal patient care in the future. Until that time comes, hospital laboratories must decide whether to employ reference laboratory services more or less, enter a joint venture with a reference laboratory, or become a reference laboratory. Some of the items that could be considered in arriving at this decision are listed in Table 2. Some items favor hospital laboratories; some favor reference laboratories; some are a toss-up; and some suggest there are advantages in a team approach. For the present, we believe there are many arguments favoring a continuation and possibly even an expansion of hospital laboratory services, but this will likely be most feasible in financially sound and progressive hospitals having forward-looking administrators and imaginative but fiscally minded laboratory directors and managers. If decisions are made to send more tests to reference laboratories, each hospital or user laboratory must seek the best and most cost-effective services available. Various financial, technical, and medical considerations are described that should aid in the evaluation of where to have tests performed. We have provided suggestions on how agreements with reference laboratories can be established in either a formal (contractual) or an informal (verbal) way. Additionally, we have described methods for evaluating (or monitoring) the quality and quantity of services received from a reference laboratory. In general, for any significant agreement with a reputable reference laboratory, little more may be necessary for monitoring purposes than periodic financial and quality assurance audits and follow-up on any clinical complaints regarding test results. With a large contract, the user laboratory is advised to spot check results on submitted blind duplicates of patient samples (to test provider lab precision) and occasionally to split samples between the provider and one or more other reference laboratories (as a first look at possible inaccuracy).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在我们即将进入的成本控制时代,医院实验室和独立于医院的参考实验室需要做出改变,以便提供全面、符合医学需求且价格合理的实验室服务。这种改变必须在经济和技术上具有创新性,并且与社会下一代医疗保健需求相关。医院实验室和商业实验室相对于彼此可能会变弱或变强,但我们猜测它们最终会变得更加相似,甚至可能在未来联合起来提供最佳的患者护理。在那之前,医院实验室必须决定是更多还是更少地使用参考实验室服务,与参考实验室建立合资企业,还是成为参考实验室。做出这一决定时可考虑的一些项目列于表2中。有些项目有利于医院实验室;有些有利于参考实验室;有些难分高下;有些则表明团队合作方式有优势。目前,我们认为有许多理由支持继续甚至扩大医院实验室服务,但这在财务状况良好、有前瞻性管理人员以及富有想象力但注重财务的实验室主任和经理的进步医院中可能最为可行。如果决定将更多检测项目送到参考实验室,每个医院或用户实验室都必须寻求可获得的最佳且最具成本效益的服务。文中描述了各种财务、技术和医学方面的考虑因素,这些应有助于评估检测项目的执行地点。我们就如何以正式(合同)或非正式(口头)方式与参考实验室达成协议提供了建议。此外,我们还描述了评估(或监测)从参考实验室获得的服务质量和数量的方法。一般来说,对于与知名参考实验室达成的任何重大协议,出于监测目的,可能只需定期进行财务和质量保证审计,并跟进任何有关检测结果的临床投诉即可。对于大合同,建议用户实验室对提交的患者样本盲样重复检测结果进行抽查(以测试供应商实验室的精密度),并偶尔将样本分发给供应商和一个或多个其他参考实验室(作为对可能存在的不准确情况的初步检查)。(摘要截选至400字)