Dodd Keith, McHugo Maureen, Sarabia Lauren, Wylie Korey P, Legget Kristina T, Cornier Marc-Andre, Tregellas Jason R
Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Aug 20;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.114. eCollection 2025.
Independent component analysis (ICA) denoising methods can be highly effective for reducing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) noise. ICA denoising method success heavily depends, however, on the accurate classification of fMRI data ICs as either neural signal or noise. While manual IC classification ("manual ICA denoising") is a current gold-standard, it requires extensive time and training. Automated methods of IC classification ("automated ICA denoising"), meanwhile, are less accurate and effective, especially in clinical populations where motion artifacts are more common. To address these challenges, a novel denoising method, Comprehensive Independent Component Analysis Denoising Assistant (CICADA), was developed. Uniquely, CICADA uses manual classification guidelines to automatically, comprehensively, and accurately capture most common sources of fMRI noise. As such, we hypothesized that CICADA would perform similarly to manual ICA denoising and outperform other current automated denoising methods. CICADA was evaluated against two well-established automated ICA denoising methods (FIX and ICA-AROMA) across three fMRI datasets. The datasets included high-motion resting-state (N = 57) and visual-task data (N = 53), both from individuals with schizophrenia, as well as low-motion resting-state healthy control data from an openly available dataset (N = 56). IC classification accuracy was first evaluated against manual IC classification in a subset (N = 30) of each dataset. Denoising performance efficacy was then evaluated with commonly used quality control (QC) benchmarks and correlations with fMRI noise profiles across all data. With a 97.9% mean overall accuracy in IC classification, CICADA performed nearly as well as manual IC classification and was significantly more accurate than FIX (92.9% mean overall accuracy; all p-values < 0.01) and ICA-AROMA (83.8% mean overall accuracy; all p-values < 0.001). CICADA also matched or outperformed FIX and ICA-AROMA across most QC and noise profile metrics across all data. Furthermore, CICADA greatly eased implementation of manual ICA denoising by decreasing the number of ICs a user must inspect by an average of 75%. Overall, CICADA is a novel, accurate, comprehensive, and automated ICA denoising tool for use in both resting-state and task-based fMRI. It performed similarly to the labor-intensive manual IC classification gold-standard and, in some datasets, outperformed current automated ICA denoising methods. Finally, CICADA may facilitate more efficient manual ICA denoising without reducing efficacy.
独立成分分析(ICA)去噪方法在降低功能磁共振成像(fMRI)噪声方面可能非常有效。然而,ICA去噪方法的成功很大程度上取决于将fMRI数据独立成分准确分类为神经信号或噪声。虽然手动独立成分分类(“手动ICA去噪”)是当前的金标准,但它需要大量时间和培训。与此同时,独立成分分类的自动化方法(“自动化ICA去噪”)不太准确且效果不佳,尤其是在运动伪影更常见的临床人群中。为应对这些挑战,开发了一种新型去噪方法——综合独立成分分析去噪助手(CICADA)。独特的是,CICADA使用手动分类指南来自动、全面且准确地捕捉fMRI噪声的最常见来源。因此,我们假设CICADA的表现将与手动ICA去噪相似,并且优于其他当前的自动化去噪方法。在三个fMRI数据集上,将CICADA与两种成熟的自动化ICA去噪方法(FIX和ICA - AROMA)进行了评估。这些数据集包括来自精神分裂症患者的高运动静息态(N = 57)和视觉任务数据(N = 53),以及来自一个公开可用数据集的低运动静息态健康对照数据(N = 56)。首先在每个数据集的一个子集(N = 30)中,对照手动独立成分分类评估独立成分分类的准确性。然后使用常用的质量控制(QC)基准以及与所有数据的fMRI噪声特征的相关性来评估去噪性能效果。CICADA在独立成分分类中的平均总体准确率为97.9%,其表现几乎与手动独立成分分类一样好,并且比FIX(平均总体准确率92.9%;所有p值<0.01)和ICA - AROMA(平均总体准确率83.8%;所有p值<0.001)显著更准确。在所有数据的大多数QC和噪声特征指标方面,CICADA也与FIX和ICA - AROMA相当或更优。此外,CICADA通过将用户必须检查的独立成分数量平均减少75%,极大地简化了手动ICA去噪的实施。总体而言,CICADA是一种用于静息态和基于任务的fMRI的新型、准确、全面且自动化的ICA去噪工具。它的表现与劳动密集型的手动独立成分分类金标准相似,并且在某些数据集中优于当前自动化ICA去噪方法。最后,CICADA可能有助于更高效地进行手动ICA去噪而不降低效果。