Karlberg A T, Bergstedt E, Boman A, Bohlinder K, Lidén C, Lars J, Nilsson G, Wahlberg J E
Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Oct;13(4):209-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1985.tb02552.x.
In order to investigate whether abietic acid itself is the allergenic component of colophony, 2 commercial samples were extensively purified and tested in guinea pigs and in colophony-sensitive patients. In the modified FCAT method, sensitization was obtained with Portuguese colophony and when challenged with purified abietic acid, the animals showed no reaction. In the GMPT method, the animals were exposed to purified abietic acid. Challenging with 2 different samples of it gave no significant reaction. When patch tested, patients sensitive to colophony showed no reactions to abietic acid which had been purified immediately before the test. It is concluded that abietic acid itself is not a contact allergen.
为了研究松香酸本身是否为松香的致敏成分,对2个商业样品进行了充分纯化,并在豚鼠和对松香敏感的患者中进行了测试。在改良的FCAT方法中,用葡萄牙松香进行致敏,当用纯化的松香酸激发时,动物未出现反应。在GMPT方法中,动物接触纯化的松香酸。用其2个不同样品激发未产生明显反应。当进行斑贴试验时,对松香敏感的患者对测试前立即纯化的松香酸无反应。结论是松香酸本身不是接触性变应原。