Lei Lu, Qing Shang Hong, Wei Li, Li Zhu Li, Tao Wang Bing, Yudong Zhang, Meng Li Yu, Xiang Yao Xiao
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Haidian Hospital, China.
J Int Med Res. 2025 Aug;53(8):3000605251367623. doi: 10.1177/03000605251367623. Epub 2025 Aug 25.
PurposeThis retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and postoperative recovery characteristics of conventional open surgery, ultrasound-guided minimally invasive rotary cutting, and microwave ablation in the treatment of benign breast tumors, using historical patient data.MethodsIn total, 164 patients with benign breast tumors treated at Haidian Hospital, Beijing, from January 2020 to January 2023 were selected as study participants. Based on the treatment received by the patients, they were divided into three groups: open surgery group (87 patients treated with conventional open excision surgery), rotary cutting group (65 patients treated with Micromotion minimally invasive rotary cutting under color Doppler ultrasound guidance), and ablation group (12 patients treated with microwave ablation). Subsequently, key indicators, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, incision healing time, postoperative pain score, incidence of postoperative complications, and aesthetic outcome of the breast, were comprehensively compared and analyzed among the three groups.ResultsStatistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.05) among the groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, incision healing time, and postoperative pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 h. Specifically, the ablation group showed significantly lower values for these parameters compared with the rotary cutting and open surgery groups. The rotary cutting group exhibited better outcomes than the open surgery group across these metrics. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcome of the breast in the ablation and rotary cutting groups were significantly better than those in the open surgery group (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications and the aesthetic outcome of the breast between the ablation and rotary cutting groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionCompared with conventional open surgery, microwave ablation and Micromotion minimally invasive rotary cutting under color Doppler ultrasound guidance demonstrate superior surgical outcomes, lower postoperative pain levels, and reduced incidence of postoperative complications in the treatment of benign breast tumors. Microwave ablation offers shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, and significantly greater pain relief while providing better aesthetic outcome of the breast.
目的
本回顾性研究旨在利用历史患者数据,比较传统开放手术、超声引导下微创旋切术和微波消融术治疗良性乳腺肿瘤的临床疗效、安全性及术后恢复特征。
方法
选取2020年1月至2023年1月在北京海淀医院接受治疗的164例良性乳腺肿瘤患者作为研究对象。根据患者接受的治疗方法,将其分为三组:开放手术组(87例行传统开放切除术)、旋切组(65例行彩色多普勒超声引导下微运动微创旋切术)和消融组(12例行微波消融术)。随后,对三组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、切口愈合时间、术后疼痛评分、术后并发症发生率及乳房美观效果等关键指标进行综合比较和分析。
结果
统计分析显示,三组患者在手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、切口愈合时间以及术后24、48和72小时的疼痛评分方面存在显著差异(P<0.05)。具体而言,消融组在这些参数上的值明显低于旋切组和开放手术组。在这些指标上,旋切组的效果优于开放手术组。此外,消融组和旋切组的术后并发症发生率及乳房美观效果明显优于开放手术组(P<0.05)。然而,消融组和旋切组在术后并发症发生率及乳房美观效果方面未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。
结论
与传统开放手术相比,微波消融术和彩色多普勒超声引导下的微运动微创旋切术在治疗良性乳腺肿瘤方面具有更好的手术效果、更低的术后疼痛程度和更低的术后并发症发生率。微波消融术手术时间更短、术中出血量更少、术后恢复更快、疼痛缓解更显著,同时乳房美观效果更好。