Meisner Julianne, Bodha Boku, Stothard J Russell, Juhasz Alexandra, Makaula Peter, Musaya Janelisa, Ngere Isaac, Gachohi John, Njenga M Kariuki, Oketch Dismas, Muriuki Waiguru, Osoro Eric
Department of Global Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Department of Veterinary Services, Marsabit, Kenya.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 25;5(8):e0002960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002960. eCollection 2025.
Livestock geotrackers are increasingly used for public health research, particularly within the field of One Health, to draw inference on pathogen exposure and human risk from livestock movement data. There are many dozens, if not hundreds, of devices available to researchers, including devices purpose built for livestock such as collars, ear tags, rumen boluses (placed in the forestomach of a ruminant), or other formats; those intended for wildlife but suitable for livestock; and devices intended for other geotracking applications which can be retrofitted for livestock. To assist other researchers in navigating the wealth of available options, we present here our experiences with six devices-four intended for livestock, one intended for wildlife, and one intended for humans- applied to cattle, camels, sheep, goats, and donkeys in rural locations in Eastern and Southern Africa. We summarize the technical specifications and features of these devices, our deployment strategies, and our experiences in terms of battery life, durability, data quality and retrieval, and acceptability by livestock owners. We found that both FindMy and CatLog2 performed well and were cost-effective at under $250 per unit. While FindMy is more costly than CatLog2, this device transmits signal, allowing users to track device locations from an app or browser. Our results support other One Health researchers weighing the hundreds of options for livestock geotracking available to them, considering their project's context, objectives, and available resources.
牲畜地理追踪器越来越多地用于公共卫生研究,特别是在“同一个健康”领域,以便根据牲畜移动数据推断病原体暴露情况和人类风险。研究人员可以使用的设备有几十种,甚至可能有数百种,包括专门为牲畜设计的设备,如项圈、耳标、瘤胃丸剂(放置在反刍动物的前胃中)或其他形式;适用于野生动物但也适合牲畜的设备;以及可改装用于牲畜的其他地理追踪应用设备。为了帮助其他研究人员在众多可用选项中做出选择,我们在此介绍我们使用六种设备的经验——四种用于牲畜,一种用于野生动物,一种用于人类——这些设备应用于东非和南非农村地区的牛、骆驼、绵羊、山羊和驴。我们总结了这些设备的技术规格和特点、我们的部署策略,以及在电池寿命、耐用性、数据质量和检索以及牲畜所有者接受度方面的经验。我们发现,FindMy和CatLog2都表现良好,且性价比高,每台价格不到250美元。虽然FindMy比CatLog2更贵,但该设备可以传输信号,用户可以通过应用程序或浏览器跟踪设备位置。我们的结果为其他“同一个健康”研究人员在为其项目权衡数百种可用的牲畜地理追踪选项时提供了支持,同时要考虑项目背景、目标和可用资源。