Suppr超能文献

墨西哥城主要人群中一种新型结核病感染诊断测试的可用性和可接受性。

Usability and acceptability of a novel TB infection diagnostic test among key populations in Mexicali.

作者信息

Brumwell Amanda, Herrera Rosa, Contreras Kevin, Lee Mildred, Becerra Eduardo, Estrada-Guzmán Julia, Nicholson Thomas, Contreras Rene Machado, Brooks Meredith

机构信息

Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Advance Access & Delivery, Inc, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 25;5(8):e0005042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005042. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Tuberculin skin test (TST) remains the standard-of-care test for TB infection in many high TB-burden settings. Despite existing diagnostics overcoming challenges associated with TST implementation, there has been poor uptake programmatically. We conducted formative research into patients' and providers' perceptions of acceptability and usability of a novel IGRA test, called QIAreach QuantiFERON TB (or, QIAreach), compared to TST in a programmatic setting in Mexicali. Programmatic outreach to screen for TB disease and infection was conducted in Mexicali (December 2020-July 2021). A 5-point Likert scale survey was administered to two groups at high risk of TB infection-people who use drugs (PWUD) and household contacts (HHC) of TB patients-and who received testing via TST and QIAreach. This survey evaluated patients' comparative preferences for the two tests. Additionally, a modified system usability scale was administered to TB program staff involved in the administration and processing of TST and IGRA tests pre- and post-QIAreach implementation to measure the tests' perceived usability. Of 201 patients, 103 (51.2%) were PWUD and 98 (48.8%) were HHCs. The acceptability survey found that the blood draw for QIAreach was preferred to, and more trustworthy than, the injection for TST. Also, only requiring one visit with providers for QIAreach was preferred among HHCs, but comparatively less preferable for PWUD. In-person delivery of test results was preferable and more trustworthy. The majority preferred QIAreach over TST; though this was higher among PWUD. Nine staff completed the usability survey. Perceived usability before implementing the IGRA remained nearly constant from the pre-implementation timepoint (SUS Score: 52.5, IQR: 45-65) to the post-implementation timepoint (50, IQR: 45-52.5, p = 0.31). IGRA was more acceptable to patients, and perceived usability was mixed among staff. Patient and provider preferences must be considered when integrating novel IGRA tests into settings where TST is routinely used.

摘要

在许多结核病高负担地区,结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)仍是结核病感染的标准护理检测方法。尽管现有诊断方法克服了与TST实施相关的挑战,但在项目层面的采用情况却很差。我们在墨西卡利的一个项目环境中,对患者和医疗服务提供者对一种名为QIAreach QuantiFERON TB(或QIAreach)的新型干扰素释放试验(IGRA)与TST的可接受性和可用性的看法进行了形成性研究。在墨西卡利开展了结核病疾病和感染筛查的项目外展活动(2020年12月至2021年7月)。对两组结核病感染高危人群——吸毒者(PWUD)和结核病患者的家庭接触者(HHC)——进行了5级李克特量表调查,他们通过TST和QIAreach接受检测。该调查评估了患者对这两种检测的比较偏好。此外,在QIAreach实施前后,对参与TST和IGRA检测管理与处理的结核病项目工作人员进行了改良的系统可用性量表调查,以衡量检测的感知可用性。在201名患者中,103名(51.2%)是吸毒者,98名(48.8%)是家庭接触者。可接受性调查发现,与TST注射相比,患者更喜欢QIAreach的抽血方式且认为其更可靠。此外,家庭接触者更喜欢QIAreach只需要与医疗服务提供者就诊一次,但吸毒者相对不太喜欢。亲自提供检测结果更可取且更可靠。大多数人更喜欢QIAreach而不是TST;不过吸毒者中的比例更高。9名工作人员完成了可用性调查。从实施前时间点到实施后时间点,IGRA实施前的感知可用性几乎保持不变(系统可用性量表得分:52.5,四分位距:45 - 65)至(50,四分位距:45 - 52.5,p = 0.31)。IGRA对患者更具可接受性,工作人员对其感知可用性则褒贬不一。在将新型IGRA检测纳入常规使用TST的环境时,必须考虑患者和医疗服务提供者的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/871f/12377580/a0fffac50c32/pgph.0005042.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验