Rickman Hannah M, Phiri Mphatso D, Mbale Hannah, Horton Katherine C, Henrion Marc Y R, Nightingale Emily S, Seddon James A, Corbett Elizabeth L, MacPherson Peter
Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jan 31;63(1):e0132324. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01323-24. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Urgent improvements in the diagnosis and management of infection are required to reach End TB goals. Conventional interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), such as QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), require substantial laboratory infrastructure and large blood volumes, limiting use in high-burden settings. The QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB (QIAreach QFT) was developed to overcome these challenges but has not previously been evaluated in field conditions in a low-income, high-burden country, or at scale in children. We performed a diagnostic evaluation of QIAreach QFT against QFT-Plus, in a cross-sectional IGRA survey in Blantyre, Malawi. We recruited a population-representative sample of children aged 1-4 years and adolescents and adults aged 10-40 years, from households and primary care. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa for QIAreach QFT against QFT-Plus, and constructed Bayesian hurdle-categorical models to compare quantitative test results. A total of 1,049 participants were recruited (64%: 1-4 years; 13%: 10-19 years; and 23%: 20-40 years). More participants had a positive QIAreach QFT result (32%) compared to QFT-Plus (15%). Over half of positive QIAreach QFT results had time-to-positivity of exactly 20 min, the assay cutoff. There was minimal agreement between QFT-Plus and QIAreach QFT results ( = 0.26), which was lowest in children aged 1-4 years ( = 0.13). Sensitivity and specificity of QIAreach QFT relative to QFT-Plus were 62% and 74%, respectively, with poor correlation between quantitative results. The suboptimal performance of QIAreach QFT, particularly in young children, suggests that it cannot currently be recommended for wider use and that the urgent need for an accessible test of Mtb infection remains unmet.
Almost a quarter of the world's population has evidence of (Mtb) infection. Monitoring and addressing this substantial burden of so-called "latent" tuberculosis (TB) infection will be critical to reach End TB targets. However, current interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) for Mtb infection are costly, and require a large volume of venous blood and significant laboratory processing, which are major barriers to their wider use in low-income countries. The novel QIAreach QuantiFERON-TB (QIAreach) assay has been designed as a more accessible alternative. We sought to evaluate it against a reference standard of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, in a large cross-sectional survey in Blantyre, Malawi. To our knowledge, this is the first diagnostic evaluation of QIAreach QFT to be performed in a population-based survey in a low-income high-incidence setting, and to specifically focus on young children (a priority group for interventions targeting Mtb infection). In contrast to previous studies in other settings, we observed poor performance of QIAreach QFT, particularly in young children where there was little correlation between the novel test and the reference standard. This leads us to conclude that this test cannot be widely recommended for use in its current form; indeed manufacture is currently suspended. We believe our findings are of urgent importance to policymakers, clinicians, and researchers and underscore the importance of careful evaluation of new diagnostics in the contexts where they are intended to be used.
为实现终结结核病目标,需要对感染的诊断和管理进行紧急改进。传统的干扰素-γ释放检测(IGRAs),如结核感染T细胞检测升级版(QFT-Plus),需要大量实验室基础设施和大量血液样本,限制了在高负担地区的应用。QIAreach结核感染T细胞检测(QIAreach QFT)的研发旨在克服这些挑战,但此前尚未在低收入、高负担国家的现场条件下或在儿童中大规模进行评估。我们在马拉维布兰太尔进行了一项横断面IGRA调查,对QIAreach QFT与QFT-Plus进行了诊断评估。我们从家庭和初级保健机构中招募了具有人群代表性的1-4岁儿童以及10-40岁的青少年和成年人样本。我们计算了QIAreach QFT相对于QFT-Plus的敏感性、特异性和科恩kappa系数,并构建了贝叶斯障碍分类模型以比较定量检测结果。总共招募了1049名参与者(64%为1-4岁;13%为10-19岁;23%为20-40岁)。与QFT-Plus(15%)相比,更多参与者的QIAreach QFT结果为阳性(32%)。超过一半的QIAreach QFT阳性结果的阳性时间恰好为20分钟,即检测临界值。QFT-Plus与QIAreach QFT结果之间的一致性极低(κ = 0.26),在1-4岁儿童中最低(κ = 0.13)。QIAreach QFT相对于QFT-Plus的敏感性和特异性分别为62%和74%,定量结果之间的相关性较差。QIAreach QFT的表现欠佳,尤其是在幼儿中,这表明目前不能推荐其广泛使用,对结核分枝杆菌感染进行便捷检测的迫切需求仍未得到满足。
世界上近四分之一的人口有结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)感染的证据。监测和应对这种所谓“潜伏性”结核感染的巨大负担对于实现终结结核病目标至关重要。然而,目前用于检测Mtb感染的干扰素-γ释放检测(IGRAs)成本高昂,需要大量静脉血且实验室处理要求高,这是其在低收入国家广泛应用的主要障碍。新型的QIAreach结核感染T细胞检测(QIAreach)被设计为一种更易于使用的替代方法。我们试图在马拉维布兰太尔的一项大型横断面调查中,将其与结核感染T细胞检测升级版这一参考标准进行评估。据我们所知,这是首次在低收入高发病率地区基于人群的调查中对QIAreach QFT进行诊断评估,并且特别关注幼儿(针对Mtb感染干预的优先群体)。与之前在其他环境中的研究不同,我们观察到QIAreach QFT表现不佳,尤其是在幼儿中,新型检测与参考标准之间几乎没有相关性。这使我们得出结论,不能广泛推荐以其当前形式使用该检测;实际上目前已暂停生产。我们相信我们的研究结果对政策制定者、临床医生和研究人员具有迫切的重要性,并强调在新诊断方法预期使用的背景下进行仔细评估的重要性。