Dijkstra Lotte, Gülöksüz Sinan, Batalla Albert, van Os Jim
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0330365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330365. eCollection 2025.
We aimed to explore temporal patterns of mental healthcare expenditure over the period 2015-2020 by age and type of mental healthcare, as well as by sex. A records-based cohort study using comprehensive data from health insurers in the Netherlands at the 4-number postal code level was performed. We used cluster-weighted linear regressions to examine temporal patterns of mental healthcare expenditure by age group (young: 18-34 vs old: 35-65), sex, and type of care. We examined the interaction of age with sex by adding the interaction between age, year, and sex to the model. The predicted costs were higher for ages 18-34 compared to older adults aged 35-64 for all mental healthcare costs except general practitioner mental healthcare (GP-MHC). The baseline regression coefficient for the young age group was 0.23 (95%-CI = 0.21;0.24) for all mental healthcare costs combined, 0.22 (95%-CI = 0.21;0.24) for specialized mental healthcare (SPECIALIST-MHC), 0.08 (95%-CI = 0.07;0.09) for basic mental health care (BASIC-MHC) and -0.02 (95%-CI = -0.03;-0.01) for GP-MHC. There was evidence for an interaction between age and year (p < 0.0001). Women had higher mental healthcare costs than men at all time points. We found an interaction between age, sex and year (p < 0.0001), with a stronger increase in the age-cost association SPECIALIST-MHC in women, while men showed a lower but more strongly increasing age-cost association for BASIC-MHC and GP-MHC. Our study found that while young women represent an increasing share of SPECIALIST-MHC, BASIC-MHC, and GP-MHC show a stronger rise in costs for young men. Future research should address whether this is due to an overlooked need for care among young men.
我们旨在探讨2015年至2020年期间按年龄、精神卫生保健类型以及性别划分的精神卫生保健支出的时间模式。我们进行了一项基于记录的队列研究,使用了荷兰健康保险公司在4位邮政编码级别上的综合数据。我们使用聚类加权线性回归来研究按年龄组(年轻人:18 - 34岁与老年人:35 - 65岁)、性别和护理类型划分的精神卫生保健支出的时间模式。我们通过在模型中加入年龄、年份和性别的交互项来检验年龄与性别的交互作用。除全科医生精神卫生保健(GP - MHC)外,所有精神卫生保健费用中,18 - 34岁人群的预测成本高于35 - 64岁的老年人。所有精神卫生保健费用综合起来,年轻年龄组的基线回归系数为0.23(95%置信区间 = 0.21;0.24),专科精神卫生保健(SPECIALIST - MHC)为0.22(95%置信区间 = 0.21;0.24),基本精神卫生保健(BASIC - MHC)为0.08(95%置信区间 = 0.07;0.09),GP - MHC为 - 0.02(95%置信区间 = - 0.03;- 0.01)。有证据表明年龄与年份之间存在交互作用(p < 0.0001)。在所有时间点,女性的精神卫生保健费用都高于男性。我们发现年龄、性别和年份之间存在交互作用(p < 0.0001),女性专科精神卫生保健(SPECIALIST - MHC)的年龄 - 成本关联增长更强,而男性基本精神卫生保健(BASIC - MHC)和GP - MHC的年龄 - 成本关联虽较低但增长更强。我们的研究发现,虽然年轻女性在专科精神卫生保健(SPECIALIST - MHC)中的占比不断增加,但基本精神卫生保健(BASIC - MHC)和GP - MHC在年轻男性中的成本增长更为强劲。未来的研究应探讨这是否是由于年轻男性中被忽视的护理需求所致。