Fleming Terry, Lucassen Mathijs, Frampton Chris, Parag Varsha, Bullen Chris, Merry Sally, Shepherd Matthew, Stasiak Karolina
Te Kura Tātai Hauora School of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand, 64 7961680776, 64 800 04 04 04.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 25;27:e66047. doi: 10.2196/66047.
Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) interventions are effective in clinical trials; however, iCBT implementation data are seldom reported.
The objective of this study is to evaluate uptake, adherence, and changes in symptoms of depression for 12- to 19-year-olds using an unguided pure self-help iCBT intervention (SPARX; Smart, Positive, Active, Realistic, X-factor thoughts) during the first 7 years of it being publicly available without referral in Aotearoa New Zealand.
SPARX is a 7-module, self-help intervention designed for adolescents with mild to moderate depression. It is freely accessible to anyone with a New Zealand Internet Protocol address, without the need for a referral, and is delivered in an unguided "serious game" format. The New Zealand implementation of SPARX includes 1 symptom measure-the Patient Health Questionnaire adapted for Adolescents (PHQ-A)-which is embedded at the start of modules 1, 4, and 7. We report on uptake, the number of modules completed, and changes in depressive symptoms as measured by the PHQ-A.
In total, 21,320 adolescents aged 12 to 19 years (approximately 2% of New Zealand 12- to 19-year-olds) registered to use SPARX. Of these, 63.6% (n=13,564; comprising n=8499, 62.7% female, n=4265, 31.4% male, and n=800, 5.9% another gender identity or gender not specified; n=8741, 64.4% New Zealand European, n=1941, 14.3% Māori, n=1202, 8.9% Asian, n=538, 4.0% Pacific, and n=1142, 8.4% another ethnic identity; mean age 14.9, SD 1.9 years) started SPARX. The mean PHQ-A at baseline was 13.6 (SD 7.7) with 16.1% (n=1980) reporting no or minimal symptoms, 37.4% (n=4609) reporting mild to moderate symptoms (ie, the target group) and 46.7% (n=5742) reporting moderately severe or severe symptoms. Among those who started, 51.1% (n=6927) completed module 1, 7.4% (n=997) completed at least 4 modules, and 3.1% (n=416) completed all 7 modules. The severity of symptoms reduced from baseline to modules 4 and 7. Mean PHQ-A scores for baseline, module 4, and module 7 for those who completed 2 or more assessments were 14.0 (SD 7.0), 11.8 (SD 7.9), and 10.5 (SD 8.5), respectively; mean difference for modules 1-4 was 2.2 (SD 5.7; P<.001) and for modules 1-7 was 3.6 (SD 7.0; P<.001). Corresponding effect sizes were 0.38 (modules 1-4) and 0.51 (modules 1-7).
SPARX reached a meaningful proportion of the adolescent population. The effect size for those who engaged with it was comparable to trial results. However, completion was low. Key challenges included logistical barriers such as slow download speeds and compatibility with some devices. Ongoing attention to rapidly evolving technologies and engagement with them are required. Real-world implementation analyses offer important insights for understanding and improving the impact of evidence-based digital tools and should be routinely reported.
基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)干预措施在临床试验中是有效的;然而,iCBT实施数据很少被报告。
本研究的目的是评估在新西兰奥塔哥地区,一种无引导的纯自助式iCBT干预措施(SPARX;明智、积极、主动、现实、X因素思维)在公开可用的前7年中,12至19岁青少年对其的接受程度、依从性以及抑郁症状的变化,无需转诊。
SPARX是一种为轻度至中度抑郁症青少年设计的7模块自助干预措施。任何拥有新西兰互联网协议地址的人都可以免费使用,无需转诊,并且以无引导的“严肃游戏”形式提供。SPARX在新西兰的实施包括1种症状测量工具——适用于青少年的患者健康问卷(PHQ-A),该问卷嵌入在第1、4和7模块的开头。我们报告接受程度、完成的模块数量以及PHQ-A测量的抑郁症状变化。
总共有21320名12至19岁的青少年(约占新西兰12至19岁青少年的2%)注册使用SPARX。其中,63.6%(n = 13564)开始使用SPARX(包括n = 8499名女性,占62.7%;n = 4265名男性,占31.4%;n = 800名其他性别认同或未指定性别的青少年,占5.9%;n = 8741名新西兰欧洲人,占64.4%;n = 1941名毛利人,占14.3%;n = 1202名亚洲人,占8.9%;n = 538名太平洋岛民,占4.0%;n = 1142名其他种族身份的青少年,占8.4%;平均年龄14.9岁,标准差1.9岁)。基线时PHQ-A的平均得分是13.6(标准差7.7),其中16.1%(n = 1980)报告无或轻微症状,37.4%(n = 4609)报告轻度至中度症状(即目标群体),46.7%(n = 5742)报告中度严重或严重症状。在开始使用的人群中,51.1%(n = 6927)完成了第1模块,7.4%(n = 997)完成了至少4个模块,3.1%(n = 416)完成了所有7个模块。症状严重程度从基线到第4和第7模块有所降低。完成2次或更多评估的人群在基线、第4模块和第7模块的PHQ-A平均得分分别为14.0(标准差7.0)、11.8(标准差7.9)和10.5(标准差8.5);第1至4模块的平均差异为2.2(标准差5.7;P <.001),第1至7模块的平均差异为3.6(标准差7.0;P <.001)。相应的效应大小分别为0.38(第1至4模块)和0.51(第1至7模块)。
SPARX覆盖了相当比例的青少年人群。参与其中的人群的效应大小与试验结果相当。然而,完成率较低。主要挑战包括后勤障碍,如下载速度慢以及与某些设备的兼容性问题。需要持续关注快速发展的技术并与之接轨。实际应用分析为理解和改善循证数字工具的影响提供了重要见解,应定期报告。