School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
School of Health, Faculty of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;58(8):678-692. doi: 10.1177/00048674241243262. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
The objective was to identify clinically meaningful groups of adolescents based on self-reported mental health and wellbeing data in a population sample of New Zealand secondary school students.
We conducted a cluster analysis of six variables from the Youth19 Rangatahi Smart Survey ( = 7721, ages 13-18 years, 2019): wellbeing (World Health Organization Well-Being Index), possible anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item, adapted), depression symptoms (short form of the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale) and past-year self-harm, suicide ideation and suicide attempt. Demographic, contextual and behavioural predictors of cluster membership were determined through multiple discriminant function analysis. We performed cross-validation analyses using holdout samples.
We identified five clusters ( = 7083). The cluster ( = 2855, 40.31%) reported positive mental health across indicators; the cluster ( = 1994, 28.15%) reported high possible anxiety symptoms and otherwise generally positive results; the cluster ( = 667, 9.42%) reported sub-clinical depression and possible anxiety symptoms and some self-harm; the cluster ( = 1116, 15.76%) reported above-cutoff depression and possible anxiety symptoms and high suicide ideation; and the cluster ( = 451; 6.37%) reported the least positive mental health across indicators. Female, rainbow, Māori and Pacific students and those in higher deprivation areas were overrepresented in higher severity clusters. Factors including exposure to sexual harm and discrimination were associated with increasing cluster severity.
We identified high prevalence of mental health challenges among adolescents, with distinct clusters of need. Youth mental health is not 'one size fits all'. Future research should explore youth behaviour and preferences in accessing support and consider how to best support the mental health of each cluster.
本研究旨在根据新西兰中学生群体的自我报告心理健康和幸福感数据,确定基于临床意义的青少年亚群。
我们对 Youth19 Rangatahi Smart 调查中的 6 个变量(n = 7721,年龄 13-18 岁,2019 年)进行聚类分析:幸福感(世界卫生组织幸福感指数)、可能的焦虑症状(广义焦虑障碍 2 项,改编)、抑郁症状(Reynolds 青少年抑郁量表简表)以及过去一年的自残、自杀意念和自杀企图。通过多元判别函数分析确定聚类成员的人口统计学、背景和行为预测因素。我们使用预留样本进行交叉验证分析。
我们确定了 5 个聚类(n = 7083)。聚类 1(n = 2855,40.31%)报告所有指标的心理健康均呈阳性;聚类 2(n = 1994,28.15%)报告存在较高的可能焦虑症状,但其他方面结果均较为乐观;聚类 3(n = 667,9.42%)报告有亚临床抑郁和可能的焦虑症状,以及一些自残行为;聚类 4(n = 1116,15.76%)报告存在较高的抑郁和可能的焦虑症状以及高自杀意念;聚类 5(n = 451;6.37%)报告所有指标的心理健康最不理想。女性、彩虹、毛利和太平洋族裔学生以及处于较高贫困地区的学生在较高严重程度聚类中比例较高。包括遭受性伤害和歧视在内的因素与聚类严重程度增加相关。
我们发现青少年心理健康问题普遍存在,存在不同需求的亚群。青少年心理健康并非“一刀切”。未来的研究应探索青少年在获取支持方面的行为和偏好,并考虑如何最好地支持每个聚类的心理健康。