Suppr超能文献

卫生专业人员和领导者对中国姑息治疗病房常规使用以患者为中心的结局指标的看法:一项定性研究。

Health professionals' and leaders' views on routine using patient-centered outcome measures in a Chinese palliative care unit: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Dai Yunyun, Daveson Barbara A, Ding Jinfeng, Chen Yongyi, Guo Junchen, Cheng Yu, Johnson Claire

机构信息

Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

School of Nursing, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, GX, China.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2025 Aug 26;23:e151. doi: 10.1017/S1478951525100369.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A person-centered outcomes-based quality improvement program is lacking within palliative care in Mainland China. The well-established Australian Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) national model improves palliative care quality.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare providers to integrating the PCOC model in a Chinese hospital-based palliative care unit.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured focus group and individual interviews. A rapid deductive analysis approach was selected for data analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework was used to guide the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

RESULTS

Eighteen healthcare professionals participated in this study, four focus group interviews and five individual interviews were completed. Barriers to the PCOC integration included clinical application and workload concerns (patients in terminal stage, patients' dialects, workload concerns, and staff shortages); attitudinal barriers (negative attitudes toward PCOC); psychological barriers (numbness to their work) and barriers related to knowledge and self-efficacy (lack of knowledge, capacity, and self-efficacy in palliative care). Facilitators included adapting the program to local contexts, ongoing education and feedback, effective PCOC data use, a supportive work and clinical environment and staff's perceived advantages of the model across clinical, research and process domains.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The successful integration of the PCOC program hinges on local adaptation, improved data utilization, education, and IT support. In regions with less developed palliative care, enhancing professionals' knowledge and self-efficacy is crucial. Incorporating assessment and clinical response protocols into technology can accelerate palliative care development and implementation.

摘要

背景

中国大陆的姑息治疗领域缺乏以患者为中心、基于结果的质量改进项目。成熟的澳大利亚姑息治疗结果协作组织(PCOC)国家模式可提高姑息治疗质量。

目的

本研究旨在探讨医疗服务提供者在将PCOC模式整合到中国一家医院姑息治疗科室时所感知到的障碍和促进因素。

方法

采用半结构化焦点小组和个人访谈进行定性描述性研究。选择快速演绎分析方法进行数据分析。采用实施研究综合框架来指导研究设计、数据收集、分析和解释。

结果

18名医疗专业人员参与了本研究,完成了4次焦点小组访谈和5次个人访谈。PCOC整合的障碍包括临床应用和工作量问题(晚期患者、患者方言、工作量问题和人员短缺);态度障碍(对PCOC持消极态度);心理障碍(对工作麻木)以及与知识和自我效能相关的障碍(姑息治疗方面缺乏知识、能力和自我效能)。促进因素包括使项目适应当地情况、持续教育和反馈、有效使用PCOC数据、支持性的工作和临床环境以及工作人员在临床、研究和流程领域所感知到的该模式的优势。

结果的意义

PCOC项目的成功整合取决于本地化调整、改进数据利用、教育和信息技术支持。在姑息治疗欠发达地区,提高专业人员的知识和自我效能至关重要。将评估和临床反应方案纳入技术可加速姑息治疗的发展和实施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验