Deusa-López Paula, Cuenca-Martínez Ferran, Sánchez-Martínez Vanessa, Sempere-Rubio Núria
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Physiotherapy, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
Obstetrics Department, Hospital de Dénia, Alicante, Spain.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08118-z.
To compare neonatal outcomes for immediate pushing and delayed pushing in the second stage of labor in women receiving epidural analgesia.
Systematic searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL without restrictions by language, date of publication, or methodological quality.
The inclusion criteria were based on methodological and clinical factors such as population (pregnant women with epidural analgesia), intervention and control (delayed versus immediate pushing), neonatal outcomes, and study design (systematic reviews).
The outcome measures were Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit admission, prevalence of low umbilical artery cord pH, and umbilical artery cord pH. The methodological quality was analyzed using the Assessing the Methodological Study Tool for Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) scales, and the strength of evidence was established according to the Guidelines Advisory Committee grading criteria. For the umbilical artery cord pH variable, standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis using the random-effects model.
Seven systematic reviews with meta-analysis were included. The results suggest no difference between groups for Apgar test scores at 5 min, nor in the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Mixed results were found for delayed pushing leading to improvements in Apgar test scores at 1 min. No statistically significant between-group differences in the umbilical artery cord pH were found. The total duration of the second stage in the delayed pushing group was not significantly correlated with the umbilical artery cord pH.
Delayed pushing produces at least the same neonatal outcomes as immediate pushing in healthy pregnant women receiving epidural analgesia with a single fetus in vertex presentation with a limited quality of evidence. Review registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (CRD42023397616).
比较接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇在第二产程中立即用力和延迟用力的新生儿结局。
在PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和CINAHL中进行系统检索,不受语言、出版日期或方法学质量的限制。
纳入标准基于方法学和临床因素,如研究对象(接受硬膜外镇痛的孕妇)、干预措施和对照(延迟用力与立即用力)、新生儿结局以及研究设计(系统评价)。
结局指标为1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分、新生儿重症监护病房入住率、低脐动脉血pH值的发生率以及脐动脉血pH值。使用系统评价方法学研究评估工具(AMSTAR)和系统评价中的偏倚风险(ROBIS)量表分析方法学质量,并根据指南咨询委员会的分级标准确定证据强度。对于脐动脉血pH值变量,计算标准化均数差和95%置信区间,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
纳入了七项进行荟萃分析的系统评价。结果表明,两组在5分钟时的阿氏评分以及新生儿重症监护病房入住率方面无差异。延迟用力导致1分钟时阿氏评分改善的结果不一。两组在脐动脉血pH值方面未发现具有统计学意义的差异。延迟用力组第二产程的总时长与脐动脉血pH值无显著相关性。
在证据质量有限的情况下,对于单胎头先露且接受硬膜外镇痛的健康孕妇,延迟用力产生的新生儿结局至少与立即用力相同。该综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库PROSPERO(CRD42023397616)中注册。