Suppr超能文献

椎间融合减压术与单纯减压术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的Meta分析

Decompression with interbody fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar diseases: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yuxian, Lei Shenglin, Lin Wei, Huang Yilin, Cheng Pinying, Gu Shuling, Wang Dongping

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Shenzhen Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0330926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330926. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To appraise the clinical effectiveness and complications of two surgical approaches, namely decompression alone (DA) versus decompression with interbody fusion (DF), in managing degenerative lumbar diseases (DLD).

METHODS

As of July 1, 2024, an exhaustive search identified all randomized controlled studies and cohort studies comparing DA and DF in DLD management. Relevant data were extracted using strict criteria, and study quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The extracted outcomes encompassed a range of measures, including operative duration, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospitalization length, time to ambulation, short form 12 physical component score (SF12-PCS), low back pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, leg pain VAS score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D), incidence of complications, reoperation rate, and Odom's criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 35 articles were included in this study, involving 12,030 patients. Of these, 7,442 patients were in the DA group, while 4,588 were in the DF group. Operative duration was shorter (MD = -89.09, 95%CI -92.71, -85.47, P < 0.00001), intraoperative hemorrhage was less (MD = -242.26, 95%CI -252.16, -232.36, P < 0.00001), hospitalization length was shorter (MD = -2.36, 95%CI -2.59, -2.14, P < 0.00001), and time to ambulation was reduced (MD = -10.49, 95%CI -12.52, -8.46, P < 0.00001) in the DA group than in the DF group. At the final follow-up for ODI, the DF group demonstrated statistically superior outcomes compared to the DA group (MD = 1.28, 95%CI 0.35, 2.21, P = 0.007). Data revealed no significant differences in SF12-PCS, JOA score, back pain VAS score, leg pain VAS score, final follow-up EQ-5D, reoperation rates, complication rates, and Odom's criteria (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When treating DLD, DA offers more favorable outcomes in terms of operative duration, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospitalization length, and time to ambulation. These findings suggest that DA should be considered the preferred surgical approach for most DLD patients, unless specific indications for fusion exist. Clinicians should tailor decisions to each surgery's specifics to optimize patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024580975.

摘要

目的

评估单纯减压(DA)与减压联合椎间融合(DF)这两种手术方法治疗退变性腰椎疾病(DLD)的临床疗效及并发症。

方法

截至2024年7月1日,通过全面检索确定了所有比较DA和DF治疗DLD的随机对照研究和队列研究。使用严格标准提取相关数据,并通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和Cochrane协作网工具评估研究质量。提取的结果包括一系列指标,如手术时长、术中出血、住院时间、下床活动时间、简明健康调查12项身体成分评分(SF12-PCS)、腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、腿痛VAS评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)、并发症发生率、再次手术率及奥多姆标准。

结果

本研究共纳入35篇文章,涉及12030例患者。其中,DA组7442例,DF组4588例。与DF组相比,DA组手术时长更短(MD=-89.09,95%CI -92.71,-85.47,P<0.00001)、术中出血更少(MD=-242.26,95%CI -252.16,-232.36,P<0.00001)、住院时间更短(MD=-2.36,95%CI -2.59,-2.14,P<0.00001)且下床活动时间缩短(MD=-10.49,95%CI -12.52,-8.46,P<0.00001)。在ODI末次随访时,DF组结果在统计学上优于DA组(MD=1.28,95%CI 0.35,2.21,P=0.007)。数据显示,两组在SF12-PCS、JOA评分、腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分、末次随访EQ-5D、再次手术率、并发症发生率及奥多姆标准方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

治疗DLD时,DA在手术时长、术中出血、住院时间及下床活动时间方面有更优结果。这些发现表明,除非有特定的融合指征,DA应被视为大多数DLD患者的首选手术方法。临床医生应根据每次手术的具体情况做出决策,以优化患者预后。

试验注册

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024580975。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f004/12380314/2881e91cbfdf/pone.0330926.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验