• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对中国老年乳腺癌患者的移动健康设计的症状管理偏好与用户角色发展:描述性定性研究

Symptom Management Preference and Persona Development for Mobile Health Design Targeting Chinese Older Adult Patients With Breast Cancer: Descriptive Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Li Danyu, Zhu Yanlin, Yuan Changrong, Huang Qingmei, Yang Yang, Geng Zhaohui, Yuan Xiaotong, Wu Fulei

机构信息

School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 26;12:e71448. doi: 10.2196/71448.

DOI:10.2196/71448
PMID:40857593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380362/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile health (mHealth) for breast cancer care can greatly benefit patients' symptom management. Although research supports the effectiveness of mHealth, older adult patients with breast cancer often face difficulties using it, hindering them from accessing effective symptom management possibilities. Understanding the preference for mHealth among this population is crucial for providing insights into effective mHealth design.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to better understand the symptom management preference using mHealth for Chinese older adult patients with breast cancer and use the approach of personas to inform the mHealth design.

METHODS

This was a descriptive qualitative study. In total, 17 patients with breast cancer aged 60 years and older were recruited from tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, using purposive sampling. Data were collected through one-on-one interviews. Content analysis was used to identify the factors that influence participants' symptom management preference using mHealth. The categories of influencing factors of preference informed the persona template and guided the development of the persona.

RESULTS

We identified 3 major categories affecting participants' preference for mHealth, including social interaction patterns, mHealth literacy, and symptoms. The following five personas were developed: (1) Positive Manager, (2) Dependent Parent, (3) Management Isolationist, (4) Image Manager, and (5) Clinician Dependent. We provide insights into how these personas can be used when designing and implementing mHealth for symptom management support.

CONCLUSIONS

Key factors influencing symptom management preference using mHealth among Chinese older adult patients with breast cancer and personas developed based on that can foster a better understanding of this population and initiate future mHealth design and implementation.

摘要

背景

用于乳腺癌护理的移动健康(mHealth)可极大地有益于患者的症状管理。尽管研究支持mHealth的有效性,但老年乳腺癌患者在使用它时常常面临困难,这阻碍了他们获得有效的症状管理可能性。了解这一人群对mHealth的偏好对于为有效的mHealth设计提供见解至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在更好地了解中国老年乳腺癌患者使用mHealth进行症状管理的偏好,并使用人物角色方法为mHealth设计提供信息。

方法

这是一项描述性定性研究。采用目的抽样法,从中国上海的三级医院招募了总共17名60岁及以上的乳腺癌患者。通过一对一访谈收集数据。采用内容分析法确定影响参与者使用mHealth进行症状管理偏好的因素。偏好的影响因素类别为人物角色模板提供了信息,并指导了人物角色的开发。

结果

我们确定了影响参与者对mHealth偏好的3个主要类别,包括社交互动模式、mHealth素养和症状。开发了以下五个人物角色:(1)积极管理者,(2)依赖型父母,(3)管理孤立者,(4)形象管理者,(5)依赖临床医生者。我们提供了关于在设计和实施用于症状管理支持的mHealth时如何使用这些人物角色的见解。

结论

影响中国老年乳腺癌患者使用mHealth进行症状管理偏好的关键因素以及基于此开发的人物角色有助于更好地了解这一人群,并启动未来的mHealth设计和实施。

相似文献

1
Symptom Management Preference and Persona Development for Mobile Health Design Targeting Chinese Older Adult Patients With Breast Cancer: Descriptive Qualitative Study.针对中国老年乳腺癌患者的移动健康设计的症状管理偏好与用户角色发展:描述性定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 26;12:e71448. doi: 10.2196/71448.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Designing Survey-Based Mobile Interfaces for Rural Patients With Cancer Using Apple's ResearchKit and CareKit: Usability Study.基于 Apple 的 ResearchKit 和 CareKit 为农村癌症患者设计基于调查的移动界面:可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 26;8:e57801. doi: 10.2196/57801.
4
How Do Individuals Perceive Diagnostic Labels and Explanations for Hip Pain? A Qualitative Study Among Adults With Persistent Hip Pain.个体如何看待髋关节疼痛的诊断标签和解释?一项针对持续性髋关节疼痛成年人的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003445.
5
Evaluating Effectiveness of mHealth Apps for Older Adults With Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.评估移动健康应用程序对老年糖尿病患者的有效性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 17;27:e65855. doi: 10.2196/65855.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile Apps and Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer and Survivors: Systematic Literature Review.移动应用程序与乳腺癌患者和幸存者的生活质量:系统文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 26;25:e42852. doi: 10.2196/42852.
2
Using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for chronic pain: A scoping review and narrative synthesis.在慢性疼痛电子健康干预措施开发中使用用户角色:一项范围综述与叙述性综合分析
Internet Interv. 2023 Apr 3;32:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100619. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Seeing the person before the numbers: Personas for understanding patients' life stories when using patient-reported outcome measures in practice settings.在关注数字之前先了解人:在实践环境中使用患者报告结局测量时用于理解患者生活故事的人物角色。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Apr;172:105016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105016. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
4
Cancer statistics in Chinese older people, 2022: current burden, time trends, and comparisons with the US, Japan, and the Republic of Korea.2022年中国老年人癌症统计数据:当前负担、时间趋势以及与美国、日本和韩国的比较
Sci China Life Sci. 2023 May;66(5):1079-1091. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2218-x. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
mHealth Apps Using Behavior Change Techniques to Self-report Data: Systematic Review.使用行为改变技术进行自我报告数据的移动健康应用程序:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 9;10(9):e33247. doi: 10.2196/33247.
6
Factors influencing the elderly's adoption of mHealth: an empirical study using extended UTAUT2 model.影响老年人采用移动医疗的因素:使用扩展的UTAUT2 模型的实证研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 24;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01917-3.
7
Comparison of the young aged and elderly female users' adoption of mHealth services.比较年轻女性用户和老年女性用户对移动医疗服务的采用情况。
Health Care Women Int. 2022 Oct-Nov;43(10-11):1259-1283. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2022.2039149. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Chronic disease and elder mistreatment: A meta-analysis.慢性病与老年人虐待:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5640. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
9
Facilitators and Barriers to Chronic Disease Self-Management and Mobile Health Interventions for People Living With Diabetes and Hypertension in Cambodia: Qualitative Study.柬埔寨糖尿病和高血压患者慢性病自我管理及移动医疗干预的促进因素和障碍:定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 24;8(4):e13536. doi: 10.2196/13536.
10
What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?移动健康对患者的临床价值是什么?
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 13;3:4. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x. eCollection 2020.