Chu Edward Hung-Lun, Cheng Te-Wei, Chen Philip Kuo-Ting, Chen Yen-Chun, Yueh Hann-Ziong, Lu Shih-Chun, Chi Hua-Kai, Yu Chen-Yeh, Lin Che-Hsuan
Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan 33342, Taiwan.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012413.
Previous studies have primarily evaluated postoperative middle-ear outcomes following palatoplasty and ventilation tube insertion (VTI), with a focus on patient age and cleft severity. However, few have investigated the influence of cleft sidedness and variations in Furlow-based palatoplasty techniques. This study aimed to assess the presence of otitis media with effusion (OME) before and after palatoplasty, with or without VTI, and to identify factors associated with OME, including baseline patient characteristics, cleft sidedness, and surgical approach.
We retrospectively analyzed 86 children with cleft palate or cleft lip and palate who underwent palatoplasty at our hospital from October 2017 to December 2021, with at least 2 years of follow-up evaluating middle-ear outcomes.
Age on palatoplasty date, sex, congenital anomalies, and cleft severity were not significantly associated with preoperative OME. Complete clefts showed a higher OME incidence than incomplete cleft palate in univariable analysis, but not in multivariable analysis. The utilization rate of Furlow palatoplasty combined with hard palate repair increased with increasing cleft severity. Neither the choice of palatoplasty technique nor cleft sidedness was significantly associated with the presence of OME before palatoplasty or with the development of OME after palatoplasty. Postoperative OME rates were similar between children with OME undergoing VTI and those without OME treated by palatoplasty alone.
Cleft sidedness and surgical technique did not influence OME before and after palatoplasty. Ventilation tube insertion is beneficial for patients with OME but may be unnecessary in those without prior effusion.
以往的研究主要评估了腭裂修复术和置管通气术(VTI)后的中耳结局,重点关注患者年龄和腭裂严重程度。然而,很少有研究调查腭裂侧别以及基于弗洛氏(Furlow)法腭裂修复术技术差异的影响。本研究旨在评估腭裂修复术前后伴或不伴VTI时中耳积液(OME)的存在情况,并确定与OME相关的因素,包括患者基线特征、腭裂侧别和手术方式。
我们回顾性分析了2017年10月至2021年12月在我院接受腭裂修复术的86例腭裂或唇腭裂患儿,对其进行了至少2年的随访以评估中耳结局。
腭裂手术日期时的年龄、性别、先天性异常和腭裂严重程度与术前OME无显著相关性。单因素分析中,完全性腭裂的OME发生率高于不完全性腭裂,但多因素分析中并非如此。弗洛氏腭裂修复术联合硬腭修复术的使用率随腭裂严重程度增加而升高。腭裂修复术技术的选择和腭裂侧别与腭裂修复术前OME的存在或腭裂修复术后OME的发生均无显著相关性。接受VTI的OME患儿与仅接受腭裂修复术治疗的无OME患儿术后OME发生率相似。
腭裂侧别和手术技术不影响腭裂修复术前后的OME。置管通气术对OME患者有益,但对既往无积液的患者可能不必要。