Ballhausen-Lübcker Sabrina, Ruß Anne-Kathrin, Lieb Wolfgang, Schäfer Anna, Krist Lilian, Fricke Julia, Scheibenbogen Carmen, Rabe Klaus F, Maetzler Walter, Maetzler Corina, Laudien Martin, Frank Derk, Heyckendorf Jan, Miljukov Olga, Haeusler Karl Georg, El Mokhtari Nour Eddine, Witzenrath Martin, Vehreschild Jörg Janne, Appel Katharina S, Chaplinskaya-Sobol Irina, Tamminga Thalea, Nürnberger Carolin, Schmidbauer Lena, Morbach Caroline, Störk Stefan, Reese Jens-Peter, Keil Thomas, Heuschmann Peter, Schreiber Stefan, Krawczak Michael, Bahmer Thomas
Internal Medicine Department I, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Brunswiker Straße 10, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):1072. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11368-6.
'Post-COVID Syndrome' (PCS), which encompasses the multifaceted sequelae of COVID-19, can be severity-graded by a previously defined score encompassing 12 different long-term symptom complexes. The PCS score was shown to have two main predictors, namely acute COVID-19 severity and individual resilience. The purpose of the present study was to verify these predictors and to assess their detailed relationship to the symptom complexes constituting the PCS score.
The study drew upon a largely expanded dataset (n = 3,372) from COVIDOM, the cohort study underlying the original PCS score definition. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis served to resolve the detailed relationship between the predictors and the constituting symptom complexes of the PCS score.
Among newly recruited COVIDOM participants (n = 1,930), the PCS score was again found to be associated with both its putative predictors. Of the score-constituting symptom complexes, neurological symptoms, sleep disturbance, and fatigue were predicted by individual resilience whereas the acute disease severity predicted exercise intolerance, chemosensory deficits, joint or muscle pain, signs of infection, and fatigue. These associations inspired the definition of two novel PCS scores that included the above-mentioned subsets of symptom complexes only. Similar to the original PCS score, both novel scores were found to be inversely correlated with quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L index.
The two newly defined PCS scores may enable a more refined assessment of PCS severity, both in a research context and to delineate distinct PCS subdomains with possibly different therapeutic and interventional needs in clinical practise.
“新冠后综合征”(PCS)涵盖了新冠病毒病的多方面后遗症,可通过先前定义的包含12种不同长期症状组合的评分进行严重程度分级。PCS评分有两个主要预测因素,即新冠病毒病急性发作的严重程度和个体恢复力。本研究的目的是验证这些预测因素,并评估它们与构成PCS评分的症状组合之间的详细关系。
本研究利用了来自COVIDOM的大幅扩充数据集(n = 3372),该队列研究是最初PCS评分定义的基础。分类与回归树(CART)分析用于解析预测因素与PCS评分构成症状组合之间的详细关系。
在新招募的COVIDOM参与者(n = 1930)中,再次发现PCS评分与其假定的预测因素均相关。在构成评分的症状组合中,个体恢复力可预测神经症状、睡眠障碍和疲劳,而急性疾病严重程度可预测运动不耐受、化学感觉缺陷、关节或肌肉疼痛、感染迹象和疲劳。这些关联促使定义了两个新的PCS评分,仅包括上述症状组合子集。与原始PCS评分类似,发现这两个新评分均与用EQ-5D-5L指数衡量的生活质量呈负相关。
这两个新定义的PCS评分可能在研究背景下更精确地评估PCS严重程度,并在临床实践中划分出可能具有不同治疗和干预需求的不同PCS子领域。