Suppr超能文献

使用微型内窥镜和深度学习比较精神兴奋剂和阿片类药物自我给药的神经行为表征。

Using miniscopes and deep learning to compare neurobehavioral representations of psychostimulant and opioid self-administration.

作者信息

Broomer Matthew C, Clark Caroline E, Iringan Jan Shanelle J, Wang Michael W, Beacher Nicholas J, Lin Da-Ting

机构信息

Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 333 Cassell Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

Department of Psychology, Wittenberg University, Springfield, OH, USA.

出版信息

Addict Neurosci. 2025 Sep;16. doi: 10.1016/j.addicn.2025.100224. Epub 2025 Aug 9.

Abstract

Concurrent abuse of psychostimulants and opioids represents a growing public health concern. However, preclinical models of substance use disorder often situate psychostimulants and opioids similarly within a unified self-administration procedure. This approach may fail to capture important differences in neurobehavioral activity related to each drug type. A large volume of literature suggests that, within canonical reward-related brain regions such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc), multiple reward-seeking behaviors may be represented by distinct neural populations. This comparison is often made between drug and natural rewards, however there is evidence for a similar distinction between psychostimulants and opioids. Here, we review the evidence for distinct neurobehavioral characteristics of psychostimulant versus opioid self-administration and consider the utility of two experimental approaches-miniscope calcium imaging and deep learning-assisted behavior analysis-in further exploring this topic.

摘要

精神兴奋剂和阿片类药物的同时滥用已成为一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。然而,物质使用障碍的临床前模型通常在统一的自我给药程序中将精神兴奋剂和阿片类药物类似地定位。这种方法可能无法捕捉到与每种药物类型相关的神经行为活动的重要差异。大量文献表明,在伏隔核(NAc)等典型的与奖励相关的脑区中,多种寻求奖励的行为可能由不同的神经群体来表示。这种比较通常是在药物奖励和自然奖励之间进行的,然而,有证据表明精神兴奋剂和阿片类药物之间也存在类似的区别。在这里,我们回顾了精神兴奋剂与阿片类药物自我给药不同神经行为特征的证据,并考虑了两种实验方法——微型显微镜钙成像和深度学习辅助行为分析——在进一步探索这一主题方面的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验