Qureshi Nabeel, Siconolfi Daniel, Rodriguez Anthony, Hays Ron D, Coulter Ian D, Herman Patricia M
RAND Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Adv Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Mar;1(1). doi: 10.1016/j.apro.2025.100187. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
To evaluate the concordance among three sleep disturbance items from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
We examined the effects of item wording in a sample of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic neck pain (CNP) who responded to three measures that included sleep disturbance items. We administered the items at baseline and 3-month follow-up in an observational study of patients in the United States (N=1,020). We estimated associations among the items using correlations and cross-tabulations.
Polychoric correlations among the sleep items ranged from 0.56 to 0.71. The ODI, NDI, and PROMIS-29 were strongly correlated at baseline and three months later. The cross-tabulations revealed that the ODI and NDI responses were compressed, with most responses indicating low levels of sleep disturbance. Answers to the PROMIS-29 item were more widely distributed across its response categories.
When determining the value of each measure, researchers should weigh their different properties and tie the selected measures to their unique research objectives.
评估奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数(ODI)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)和患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)中的三项睡眠障碍条目之间的一致性。
我们在慢性下腰痛(CLBP)和慢性颈痛(CNP)患者样本中研究了条目措辞的影响,这些患者对包含睡眠障碍条目的三项测量进行了回应。在美国对患者进行的一项观察性研究中(N = 1,020),我们在基线和3个月随访时施测这些条目。我们使用相关性和交叉表来估计条目之间的关联。
睡眠条目的多列相关系数范围为0.56至0.71。ODI、NDI和PROMIS - 29在基线时和三个月后高度相关。交叉表显示,ODI和NDI的回答被压缩,大多数回答表明睡眠障碍程度较低。PROMIS - 29条目的答案在其回答类别中分布更广泛。
在确定每项测量的价值时,研究人员应权衡其不同特性,并将所选测量与他们独特的研究目标联系起来。