• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT与人类营养师在在线问答平台上对饮食相关问题的回答:一项比较研究。

ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study.

作者信息

Choi Seul Ki, Moon Yunseo, Jung Hyunggu

机构信息

Graduate School of Urban Public Health, University of Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2025 Aug 21;11:20552076251361381. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361381. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076251361381
PMID:40861430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12374079/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

ChatGPT's potential as a diet information tool is emerging. However, little is known about the extent to which the information provided by ChatGPT aligns with that provided by dietitians.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess ChatGPT's capacity to provide responses to diet-related questions, compared to responses by dietitians.

METHODS

A total of 928 diet-related questions and corresponding responses from dietitians were collected from Naver Knowledge-iN, a Korean online Q&A platform, between January 18, 2023, and January 17, 2024. ChatGPT-4o was used to generate responses to the same questions. Five text similarity indices-Dice Coefficient, Jaccard Index, Overlap Coefficient, Cosine Similarity, and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency-were used to assess the similarity between ChatGPT's and dietitians' responses. Questions with the top 5% response similarity were reviewed to identify characteristics of the questions for which ChatGPT generated responses similar to those of dietitians. Responses with the bottom 5% similarity were reviewed to identify reasons for the low similarity.

RESULTS

The average similarity coefficient between ChatGPT and dietitian responses was 0.42. Questions with high response similarity tended to include detailed information, such as specific food items or portions (76.1%), the questioner's context (69.6%), or personal characteristics (17.4%). Low response similarity was mainly due to ChatGPT providing significantly longer responses than dietitians.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT demonstrated content similarity to dietitian responses, but they were not identical. The development of prompt engineering techniques to enhance ChatGPT's ability to provide more expert-like and personalized information could benefit users seeking dietary information.

摘要

背景

ChatGPT作为一种饮食信息工具的潜力正在显现。然而,对于ChatGPT提供的信息与营养师提供的信息的契合程度,人们知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在评估ChatGPT与营养师相比,对饮食相关问题提供回答的能力。

方法

2023年1月18日至2024年1月17日期间,从韩国在线问答平台Naver Knowledge-iN收集了928个与饮食相关的问题及营养师的相应回答。使用ChatGPT-4o对相同问题生成回答。采用五种文本相似度指标——骰子系数、杰卡德指数、重叠系数、余弦相似度和词频逆文档频率——来评估ChatGPT与营养师回答之间的相似度。对回答相似度排名前5%的问题进行审查,以确定ChatGPT生成与营养师相似回答的问题特征。对相似度排名后5%的回答进行审查,以确定相似度低的原因。

结果

ChatGPT与营养师回答之间的平均相似度系数为0.42。回答相似度高的问题往往包含详细信息,如特定食物项目或份量(76.1%)、提问者的背景(69.6%)或个人特征(17.4%)。回答相似度低主要是因为ChatGPT提供的回答比营养师的长得多。

结论

ChatGPT显示出与营养师回答的内容相似度,但并不完全相同。开发提示工程技术以增强ChatGPT提供更专业和个性化信息的能力,可能会使寻求饮食信息的用户受益。

相似文献

1
ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study.ChatGPT与人类营养师在在线问答平台上对饮食相关问题的回答:一项比较研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 21;11:20552076251361381. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361381. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Biologic Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Web Search.评估ChatGPT在系统性红斑狼疮生物治疗中的效用:ChatGPT与谷歌网络搜索的比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 28;9:e76458. doi: 10.2196/76458.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Using Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT to Access Medical Information About Chemical Eye Injuries: Comparative Study.使用人工智能ChatGPT获取有关化学性眼外伤的医学信息:比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 13;9:e73642. doi: 10.2196/73642.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.外周动脉疾病教育中的人工智能:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的较量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
ChatGPT and Lacrimal Drainage Disorders: Performance and Scope of Improvement.ChatGPT 与泪液排出障碍:性能与改善范围。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;39(3):221-225. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002418. Epub 2023 May 10.
8
Exploring Taiwanese Dietitians' Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT in Nutrition Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey.探索台湾营养师在营养实践中对ChatGPT的接受度和使用情况:一项横断面调查。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70108. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70108.
9
Large Language Models and Empathy: Systematic Review.大语言模型与同理心:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e52597. doi: 10.2196/52597.
10
Assessing ChatGPT's Educational Potential in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy From Clinician and Patient Perspectives: Content Quality and Readability Analysis.从临床医生和患者角度评估ChatGPT在肺癌放疗中的教育潜力:内容质量与可读性分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Aug 13;11:e69783. doi: 10.2196/69783.

本文引用的文献

1
Can artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot tools be used effectively for nutritional management in obesity?人工智能(AI)聊天机器人工具能否有效用于肥胖症的营养管理?
Nutr Health. 2025 Mar 20:2601060251329070. doi: 10.1177/02601060251329070.
2
Evaluating search engines and large language models for answering health questions.评估用于回答健康问题的搜索引擎和大语言模型。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 10;8(1):153. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01546-w.
3
ChatGPT is no nutrition encyclopedia, but does it need to be?ChatGPT不是营养百科全书,但它需要是吗?
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Apr;66:213-214. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.055. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
4
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.评估 ChatGPT 在前列腺癌患者教育中的疗效:多指标评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55939. doi: 10.2196/55939.
5
Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ChatGPT 在全球医学执照考试不同版本中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 25;26:e60807. doi: 10.2196/60807.
6
Development of AI-generated medical responses using the ChatGPT for cancer patients.利用 ChatGPT 为癌症患者开发人工智能生成的医疗回复。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Sep;254:108302. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108302. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
7
Completeness and readability of GPT-4-generated multilingual discharge instructions in the pediatric emergency department.GPT-4生成的儿科急诊科多语言出院指导的完整性和可读性。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(3):ooae050. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae050. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Assessing the Quality of ChatGPT's Dietary Advice for College Students from Dietitians' Perspectives.评估营养师视角下 ChatGPT 针对大学生的膳食建议的质量。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 19;16(12):1939. doi: 10.3390/nu16121939.
9
Validation of the Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence (QAMAI) tool: a new tool to assess the quality of health information provided by AI platforms.验证医学人工智能质量分析(QAMAI)工具:一种评估人工智能平台提供的健康信息质量的新工具。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):6123-6131. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08710-0. Epub 2024 May 4.
10
Physician Versus Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Web-Based Questions From Autistic Patients in Chinese: Cross-Sectional Comparative Analysis.中文自闭症患者网络问诊中,医生与大型语言模型聊天机器人回复的对比分析:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 30;26:e54706. doi: 10.2196/54706.