Lim Young-Myoung, Kim Ah-Ram, Lim Seung-Ju, Park Ji-Hyuk
Life Balance and Social Brain Dynamics Research Center Yonsei University Wonju Republic of Korea.
Department. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health & Medical Services Sangji University Wonju Republic of Korea.
Health Care Sci. 2025 Jul 22;4(4):243-249. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.70023. eCollection 2025 Aug.
In this study, we aimed to validate and test the reliability of the Yonsei lifestyle profile (YLP) in assessing multifaceted health lifestyle levels in a study population from the United States.
The YLP-English version and health-promoting lifestyle profile II were administered to 100 individuals living in the United States. Concurrent validity was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and discriminant validity was examined by comparing sex and age differences through -tests and multiple variance analysis. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α for each sub-factor.
The YLP-English Version demonstrated concurrent validity with the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II, showing consistent correlations for the total score (0.3, < 0.01) and frequency sub-factors (0.25-0.69, < 0.01). Among the satisfaction sub-factors, only nutrition showed a weak negative correlation (-0.19, < 0.01); all others were nonsignificant. Discriminant validity revealed no significant sex differences, but physical activity frequency varied across age groups. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's = 0.80-0.86).
In this study, we validated the YLP-English version as a reliable instrument for assessing health-related lifestyle behaviors. The YLP uniquely captures both lifestyle frequency and satisfaction, offering a comprehensive perspective on health behaviors. Although this tool is currently most applicable in population-level studies, future research should establish clinical thresholds to enhance its utility in individualized health assessments and interventions.
在本研究中,我们旨在验证并测试延世生活方式量表(YLP)在美国研究人群中评估多方面健康生活方式水平的可靠性。
对100名居住在美国的个体施测YLP英文版和健康促进生活方式量表II。使用Pearson相关系数分析同时效度,通过t检验和多元方差分析比较性别和年龄差异来检验区分效度。使用Cronbach's α评估每个子因素的内部一致性。
YLP英文版与健康促进生活方式量表II显示出同时效度,总分(0.3,P < 0.01)和频率子因素(0.25 - 0.69,P < 0.01)呈现一致的相关性。在满意度子因素中,只有营养显示出微弱的负相关(-0.19,P < 0.01);其他均无统计学意义。区分效度显示无显著性别差异,但身体活动频率在不同年龄组有所不同。内部一致性较高(Cronbach's α = 0.80 - 0.86)。
在本研究中,我们验证了YLP英文版是评估与健康相关生活方式行为的可靠工具。YLP独特地捕捉了生活方式频率和满意度,提供了关于健康行为的全面视角。尽管该工具目前最适用于人群水平研究,但未来研究应确定临床阈值,以提高其在个体健康评估和干预中的效用。